首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions >Benefits from using combined dynamical-statistical downscaling approaches lessons from a case study in the Mediterranean region
【24h】

Benefits from using combined dynamical-statistical downscaling approaches lessons from a case study in the Mediterranean region

机译:利用组合动态统计划分的好处从地中海地区的案例研究中接近课程

获取原文
       

摘要

Various downscaling techniques have been developed to bridge the scale gap between global climate models (GCMs) and finer scales required to assess hydrological impacts of climate change. Such techniques may be grouped into two downscaling approaches: the deterministic dynamical downscaling (DD) and the statistical downscaling (SD). Although SD has been traditionally seen as an alternative to DD, recent works on statistical downscaling have aimed to combine the benefits of these two approaches. The overall objective of this study is to assess whether a DD processing performed before the SD permits to obtain more suitable climate scenarios for basin scale hydrological applications starting from GCM simulations. The case study presented here focuses on the Apulia region (South East of Italy, surface area about 20 000 km2), characterised by a typical Mediterranean climate; the monthly cumulated precipitation and monthly mean of daily minimum and maximum temperature distribution were examined for the period 1953–2000. The fifth-generation ECHAM model from the Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology was adopted as GCM. The DD was carried out with the Protheus system (ENEA), while the SD was performed through a monthly quantile-quantile correction. The SD resulted efficient in reducing the mean bias in the spatial distribution at both annual and seasonal scales, but it was not able to correct the miss-modelled non-stationary components of the GCM dynamics. The DD provided a partial correction by enhancing the spatial heterogeneity of trends and the long-term time evolution predicted by the GCM. The best results were obtained through the combination of both DD and SD approaches.
机译:已经开发出各种镇流技术来弥合全球气候模型(GCMS)和更精细的尺度之间的尺度差距,以评估气候变化的水文影响。这种技术可以分为两个缩小方法:确定性动态缩小(DD)和统计缩小(SD)。虽然SD传统上被视为DD的替代方案,但最近的统计较低的作品旨在结合这两种方法的益处。本研究的总体目标是评估在SD之前执行的DD处理是否允许从GCM模拟开始获得更合适的盆地水文应用的气候情景。这里提出的案例研究侧重于普利亚地区(意大利东南部,面积约20 000公里),其特点是典型的地中海气候;每月累积降水量和每日最低和最高温度分布的每月平均值在1953 - 2000期期间检测。来自Max-Planck的气象研究所的第五代ECHAM模型被采用为GCM。 DD用Protheus系统(eNEA)进行,而SD通过每月定量位定量校正进行。 SD导致在年度和季节性尺度上减少空间分布中的平均偏差,但无法纠正GCM动态的错过模型的非静止组件。 DD通过增强趋势的空间异质性以及GCM预测的长期时间演进来提供局部校正。通过DD和SD方法的组合获得了最佳结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号