首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Hearing >Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?
【24h】

Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear-Implant and Normal-Hearing Listeners: Is the Performance Driven by Temporal or Spectral Modulation Sensitivity?

机译:耳蜗植入物和正常听力侦听器中的光谱仪调制灵敏度:是由时间或光谱调制灵敏度驱动的性能吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

This study examined the contribution of temporal and spectral modulation sensitivity to discrimination of stimuli modulated in both the time and frequency domains. The spectrotemporally modulated stimuli contained spectral ripples that shifted systematically across frequency over time at a repetition rate of 5?Hz. As the ripple density increased in the stimulus, modulation depth of the 5?Hz amplitude modulation (AM) reduced. Spectrotemporal modulation discrimination was compared with subjects’ ability to discriminate static spectral ripples and the ability to detect slow AM. The general pattern from both the cochlear implant (CI) and normal hearing groups showed that spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were correlated more strongly with AM detection than with static ripple discrimination. CI subjects’ spectrotemporal modulation thresholds were also highly correlated with speech recognition in noise, when partialing out static ripple discrimination, but the correlation was not significant when partialing out AM detection. The results indicated that temporal information was more heavily weighted in spectrotemporal modulation discrimination, and for CI subjects, it was AM sensitivity that drove the correlation between spectrotemporal modulation thresholds and speech recognition. The results suggest that for the rates tested here, temporal information processing may limit performance more than spectral information processing in both CI users and normal hearing listeners.
机译:本研究检测了时间和光谱调制敏感性对时间和频率域中调制的刺激辨别的贡献。光谱常常调制的刺激件包含频谱涟漪,其在5ΩHz的重复率下随时间系统地移动。随着刺激的纹波密度增加,5?Hz幅度调制(AM)的调制深度降低。将光谱仪调制鉴别与受试者区分静态光谱涟漪的能力进行比较,以及检测慢慢的能力。来自耳蜗植入物(CI)和正常听力组的一般图案表明,光谱仪调制阈值与AM检测比以静态纹波辨别相比更强烈地相关。当偏移静态纹波识别时,CI受试者的光谱仪器调制阈值与噪声中的语音识别高度相关,但在偏移AM检测时,相关性并不显着。结果表明,时间信息在光谱仪调制鉴别中更加重量,并且对于CI对象,它是令人敏感性,它推动了光谱调制阈值与语音识别之间的相关性。结果表明,对于此处测试的速率,时间信息处理可以限制性能超过CI用户和正常听觉侦听器中的光谱信息处理。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号