首页> 外文期刊>Heritage >Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood
【24h】

Chemical and Mechanical Differences between Historic and Modern Scots Pine Wood

机译:历史和现代苏格兰松木之间的化学和机械差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Timber is one of the most common historic building materials, but relatively little is known about how it ages in situ. Here we investigate historic and modern Scots pine to determine any chemical or mechanical differences between them. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microscopy was used to investigate differences in the chemical composition of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) timber, comparing small samples from historic beams about 500 years old with modern timber. The hemicellulosic acetyl content was reduced by about half in the historic samples, uniformly across the thickness of the beams. A chemical mechanism was therefore suggested for the loss of acetyl groups, as has been observed in paper. In paper, deacetylation and the resulting release of acetic acid are accompanied by loss of strength. Mechanical testing of the historic timber was difficult because the available length of the samples along the grain was only 20 mm. After developing a miniaturized compression test developed for the purpose, it was shown that the relative stiffness of the historic Scots pine samples was reduced by about half compared to modern material.
机译:木材是最常见的历史建筑材料之一,但也令人着眼于如何原位历史。在这里,我们调查历史和现代苏格兰松树,以确定它们之间的任何化学或机械差异。傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)显微镜用于研究苏格兰松树(Pinus Sylvestris L.)木材的化学成分的差异,比较历史梁大约500岁的历史梁与现代木材。半纤维素乙酰含量在历史样品中减少约一半,均匀地穿过梁的厚度。因此,如纸上所观察到的那样,表明乙酰基损失的化学机理。在纸上,脱乙酰化和乙酸的所得释放伴随着强度的损失。历史木材的机械测试很难,因为沿着谷物的样品的可用长度仅为20毫米。在为此目的开发出开发的小型化压缩试验之后,结果表明,与现代材料相比,历史苏格兰苏格兰松树样品的相对刚度降低了大约一半。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号