首页> 外文期刊>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Patient-reported outcomes in transition from high-dose U-100 insulin to human regular U-500 insulin in severely insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis of a randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Patient-reported outcomes in transition from high-dose U-100 insulin to human regular U-500 insulin in severely insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis of a randomized clinical trial

机译:患者报告的结果在高剂量U-100胰岛素到人常规U-500胰岛素的过渡,在严重的胰岛素抗性患者2型糖尿病患者中:随机临床试验分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Initiation and titration of human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) with a dosing algorithm of either thrice daily (TID) or twice daily (BID) improved glycemic control with fewer injections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with high-dose, high-volume U-100 insulin. The objective of this analysis was to compare patient-reported outcomes between U-500R TID and BID treatment groups in this titration-to-target randomized, clinical trial. In this 24-week, open-label, parallel trial, 325 patients were randomized to TID (n?=?162) or BID (n?=?163) U-500R after a 4-week lead-in period (screening). The Treatment Related Impact Measure-Diabetes (TRIM-D) and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were administered at screening, baseline/randomization, and endpoint (24?weeks). The Visual Analog Scale-Injection Site Pain (VAS-ISP) was assessed at baseline/randomization, 12?weeks, and endpoint. The TRIM-D showed statistically significant improvements in overall scores from baseline to endpoint for both BID and TID groups, most domains in the TID group, and all domains in the BID group. The BID group achieved better scores than the TID patients in overall and in treatment burden, daily life, and compliance domains (p??.05). EQ-5D-5L index scores showed no statistically significant differences for TID and BID groups (and no differences between TID and BID groups) from baseline to endpoint. VAS-ISP scores improved for both treatment groups (?5.60 TID;??6.47 BID; p??.05 for both) from baseline to endpoint. U500 can be successfully titrated for improved glycemic control using BID and TID regimens with diabetes-specific Patient-Reported Outcomes showing improvements in both arms; however, BID had better scores than TID in overall, treatment burden, daily life, and compliance domains. These secondary analyses are based on the study first received January 22, 2013 and reported in Clinical Trial Registry No.: NCT01774968 .
机译:使用高剂量的2型糖尿病患者的血糖治疗的血糖对血糖对照的同时(TID)或两次的剂量算法,用含量的血糖控制的同时性算法,具有较少的血糖对血糖控制的启动和滴定。大容量U-100胰岛素。该分析的目的是将患者报告的患者报告的U-500R TID和BID治疗组之间的结果进行了比较在该滴定对目标随机的临床试验中。在这24周,开放标签,并行试验中,325名患者被随机分配到TID(n?=Δ162)或4周内的介绍后(筛选)后(n?=?163)U-500R 。在筛选,基线/随机化和终点(24个周)时施用治疗相关的冲击措施 - 糖尿病(TREM-D)和EQ-5D-5L问卷调查。在基线/随机化,12?周和终点中评估视觉模拟比例注射部位疼痛(VAS-ISP)。 Trim-D在BID和TID组的基准到端点的总分数显示统计上显着的改进,TID组中的大多数域以及BID组中的所有域。 BID集团总体上和治疗负担,日常生活和合规域(P?<〜05),实现了比TID患者更好的评分。 EQ-5D-5L指数分数显示出从基线到端点的TID和BID组(TID和BID组之间的差异没有差异差异。对治疗组的VAS-ISP分数改善(?5.60 TID; ?? 6.47出价; P?<β.05)从基线到终点。 U500可以成功滴定使用培育和TID方案改善血糖控制,具有糖尿病特异性患者报告的结果,显示出两臂的改善;然而,出价比整体,治疗负担,日常生活和合规结构统一的得分更好得分。这些二级分析基于2013年1月22日首次获得的研究,并在临床试验登记处报道:NCT01774968。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号