首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >Perspectives of Vietnamese, Sudanese and South Sudanese immigrants on targeting migrant communities for latent tuberculosis screening and treatment in low‐incidence settings: A report on two Victorian community panels
【24h】

Perspectives of Vietnamese, Sudanese and South Sudanese immigrants on targeting migrant communities for latent tuberculosis screening and treatment in low‐incidence settings: A report on two Victorian community panels

机译:越南,苏丹和南苏丹移民对潜在结核病筛查和治疗的潜伏期社区的观点:两份维多利亚社区面板的报告

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Tuberculosis (TB) elimination strategies in Australia require a focus on groups who are at highest risk of TB infection, such as immigrants from high‐burden settings. Understanding attitudes to different strategies for latent TB infection (LTBI) screening and treatment is an important element of justifiable elimination strategies. Method Two community panels were conducted in Melbourne with members of the Vietnamese (n?=?11), Sudanese and South Sudanese communities (n?=?9). Panellists were provided with expert information about LTBI and different screening and health communication strategies, then deliberated on how best to pursue TB elimination in Australia. Findings Both panels unanimously preferred LTBI screening to occur pre‐migration rather than in Australia. Participants were concerned that post‐migration screening would reach fewer migrants, noted that conducting LTBI screening in Australia could stigmatize participants and that poor awareness of LTBI would hamper participation. If targeted screening was to occur in Australia, the Vietnamese panel preferred ‘place‐based’ communication strategies, whereas the Sudanese and South Sudanese panel emphasized that community leaders should lead communication strategies to minimize stigma. Both groups emphasized the importance of maintaining community trust in Australian health service providers, and the need to ensure targeting did not undermine this trust. Conclusion Pre‐migration screening was preferred. If post‐migration screening is necessary, the potential for stigma should be reduced, benefit and risk profile clearly explained and culturally appropriate communication strategies employed. Cultural attitudes to health providers, personal health management and broader social vulnerabilities of targeted groups need to be considered in the design of screening programs.
机译:背景技术结核病(TB)澳大利亚的消除策略要求重点关注以最高风险的TB感染风险,例如来自高负荷环境的移民。了解潜伏TB感染(LTBI)筛查和治疗的不同策略的态度是合理消除策略的重要因素。方法两个社区面板是在墨尔本与越南人的成员进行的(N?= 11),苏丹和南苏丹社区(n?=?9)。小组成员提供了有关LTBI和不同筛选和健康通信策略的专家信息,然后审议了在澳大利亚的最佳结核病淘汰赛。调查结果这两个面板都一致优选LTBI筛查发生前迁移而不是澳大利亚。参与者担心迁移后筛查将达到更少的移民,指出,在澳大利亚进行联系筛查可以侮辱参与者,而对LTBI的意识较差会妨碍参与。如果有针对性的筛查是在澳大利亚发生的,越南小组首选“基于地方的”的沟通策略,而苏丹和南苏丹专家小组强调,社区领导人应该领导沟通策略,以尽量减少耻辱。两组都强调了维持社区信任在澳大利亚卫生服务提供者中的重要性,并且需要确保瞄准的必要性不会破坏这一信任。结论优选迁移前筛选。如果需要迁移后筛查,应减少耻辱的潜力,效益和风险状况明确解释和文化适当的沟通策略。在筛查计划的设计中需要考虑对卫生提供者,个人健康管理和更广泛的有针对性群体的社会脆弱性的文化态度。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号