...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Services Insights >The Role of Implementation Science in Advancing Resource Generation for Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
【24h】

The Role of Implementation Science in Advancing Resource Generation for Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

机译:实施科学对低收入和中等收入国家卫生干预措施的推进作用

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear the brunt of communicable and non-communicable diseases and experience higher mortality and poor health outcomes compared to resource-rich countries. Chronic resource deficits in LMICs impede their ability to successfully address vexing health issues. Implementation science provides researchers with an approach to develop specific interventions that can generate and/or maximize resources to facilitate the implementation of other public health interventions, in resource-constrained LMIC settings. Resources generated from these interventions could be in the form of increased health workers’ skills, task shifting to free up higher-skilled health workers, increasing laboratory capacity, and using supply chain innovations to make medications available. Pivotal to the success of such interventions is ensuring feasibility in the LMIC context. We selected and appraised three case studies of evidence-based resource-generating health interventions based in LMICs (Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Madagascar), which generated or maximized resources to facilitate ongoing health services. We used a determinant implementation framework—Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify and map contextual factors that are reported to influence implementation feasibility in an LMIC setting. Contextual factors influencing the feasibility of these interventions included leadership engagement, local capacity building and readiness for research and implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs), infrastructural support for multilevel scale-up, and cultural and contextual adaptations. These factors highlight the importance of utilizing implementation science frameworks to evaluate, guide, and execute feasible public health interventions and projects in resource-limited settings. Within LMICs, we recommend EBPs incorporate feasible resource-generating components in health interventions to ensure improved and sustained optimal health outcomes.
机译:低收入和中等收入国家(LMICS)与资源丰富的国家相比,与沟通和非传染性疾病的结务和经验更高的死亡率和健康成果较高。 LMIC中的慢性资源缺陷妨碍了他们成功解决了烦恼的健康问题的能力。实施科学为研究人员提供了一种方法来开发可以生成和/或最大化资源的特定干预,以便在资源受限的LMIC设置中实现其他公共卫生干预措施。这些干预措施产生的资源可能是卫生工作者技能增加的形式,任务转移到释放高技能的卫生工作者,增加实验室能力,并利用供应链创新来制造药物可用的药物。这种干预措施的成功的关键是确保LMIC背景下的可行性。我们选择并评估了基于LMICS(赞比亚,津巴布韦和马达加斯加)的基于证据的资源生成健康干预措施的三个案例研究,这些资源产生或最大化资源,以促进持续的卫生服务。我们使用了一个决定性实施框架综合的实施研究框架(CFIR),以识别和地图据报道的上下文因素来影响LMIC设置中的实施可行性。影响这些干预措施可行性的上下文因素包括领导地参与,局部能力建设和研究和实施基于证据的实践(EBPS),对多级扩大规模的基础设施支持以及文化和情境适应的基础设施支持。这些因素突出了利用实施科学框架来评估,指导和执行可行的公共卫生干预和项目中的项目的重要性。在LMIC中,我们建议EBPS在健康干预中包含可行的资源生成组件,以确保改善和持续的最佳健康结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号