...
首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Enhancing evidence use in public health nutrition policymaking: theoretical insights from a New Zealand case study
【24h】

Enhancing evidence use in public health nutrition policymaking: theoretical insights from a New Zealand case study

机译:加强对公共卫生营养决策的证据:来自新西兰案例研究的理论见解

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Enhancing the use of evidence in policymaking is critical to addressing the global burden of nutrition-related disease. Whilst the public health nutrition community has embraced evidence-informed policymaking, their approach of defining relevant evidence and evaluating policy has not brought about major shifts in policymaking. This article uses a public health nutrition case study to refine a novel theory-informed framework for enhancing the use of evidence in government public health nutrition policymaking. Our aim is to contribute insights from evidence-informed policy to the emerging paradigm in public health nutrition policymaking. An enquiry framework informed by three groups of theories underpinning evidence-informed policy was used to explore the role of socially mediated processes on the use of evidence. A public health nutrition case study on food marketing to New Zealand children was conducted to refine the framework. Interview data collected from 54 individuals representing four key policy stakeholder groups, policymakers, academics, and food industry and non-government organisations were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. To enhance theoretical robustness, an alternative hypothesis of political explanations for evidence use was explored alongside the enquiry framework. We found the prevailing political climate influenced the impact of advocacy for evidence inclusive processes at the meta-policy and policymaking process levels and in policy community relationships. Low levels of awareness of the impact of these processes on evidence use and uncoordinated advocacy resulted in the perpetuation of ad hoc policymaking. These findings informed refinements to the enquiry framework. Our study highlights the role advocates can play in shifting government public health nutrition policymaking systems towards enhanced use of evidence. Our Advocacy for Evidence Use framework argues for a three-channel approach to advocacy for using evidence in the public interest. The framework provides a means for building a constituency for evidence use in public health nutrition and adds understanding about advocacy to the field of evidence-informed policy. Future research should examine the impact of coordinated advocacy on public health nutrition policymaking systems.
机译:加强在政策制作中使用证据对于解决与营养相关疾病的全球负担至关重要。虽然公共卫生营养界拥有证据信息的政策制定,但它们的方法决定了相关证据和评估政策的方法并未引发政策制定的重大转变。本文采用公共卫生营养案例研究,优化一个新的理论知情框架,以加强在政府公共卫生营养决策中使用证据的使用。我们的目标是在公共卫生营养决策中向新兴范式提供证据通知政策的见解。通过三组理论知情的询问框架被用来探索社会中介的进程对使用证据的作用。对新西兰儿童进行食品营销的公共卫生营养案例进行了精炼框架。采访来自代表四个关键政策利益相关者团体,政策制定者,学者和食品行业以及非政府组织的54个个人收集的数据,使用演绎和归纳专题分析分析。为了提高理论稳健性,探讨了询问框架的证据使用的政治解释的替代假设。我们发现普遍的政治气氛影响了宣传宣传的宣传包容性进程,在元政策和政策制定过程水平和政策界关系中的影响。对这些过程对证据使用和不协调的宣传的影响的低程度导致了临时政策的永久性。这些调查结果明智的询问框架内容。我们的研究突出了倡导者在改变政府公共卫生营养政策制定系统方面可以发挥作用,以加强利用证据。我们对证据使用框架的宣传旨在为三道语宣传在公共利益中使用证据的宣传方法。该框架提供了建立在公共卫生营养中有证据使用的选区的手段,并为宣传信息领域的宣传增添了对宣传的政策的综合。未来的研究应该研究协调宣传对公共卫生营养政策制定系统的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号