首页> 外文期刊>H-ermes. Journal of Communication >Relazioni promiscue. Appunti per una possibile ridefinizione dello spazio comunicativo = Promiscuous relationships. Notes for a possible redefinition of the communicative space
【24h】

Relazioni promiscue. Appunti per una possibile ridefinizione dello spazio comunicativo = Promiscuous relationships. Notes for a possible redefinition of the communicative space

机译:滥交关系。有关交际空间可能重新定义的注意事项=滥交关系。谈判可重新定义交际空间

获取原文
       

摘要

The key and monopolistic role played by the pandemic issue in the last months is a lens through which we can observe how the digital environment is reshaping the entire communicative space. In fact, the latter is constantly becoming denser, thanks to the plurality and heterogeneity of players, as well as to the expansion of their communication modalities. Starting from Bourdieu's notion of "journalistic field", we come to a new situation where voices of journalists and public sector's communicators are side by side with those of many other actors with other specific skills, who build a polyphonic and multidimensional communicative space. This multifaceted communicative space pushes us to rethink the categories of orthodoxy and informational heresy introduced by the French sociologist, considering the fact that many actors are now more interested in building their public visibility, by managing their different communication resources. In so doing, they can obtain a peculiar role and position in the communicative space, where transparency and the "power of convocation" become always more important. Based on these premises, this paper aims at exploring empirically how 10 different main actors of the public debate managed their communication strategies during the first emergency phase of the Italian lockdown. In order to test the theoretical framework here proposed, the authors investigate 6 different kinds of communication resources: reputational, institutional, professional, argumentative, performative and relational ones. The analysis focus on the activities of the following Facebook accounts: Civil Protection, Higher Institute of Health, Prime Minister, Lombardy Region, Veneto Region, as well as the personal ones of Prime Minister Conte, of Presidents Fontana and Zaia, and of the two currently most followed journalists on social media (Andrea Scanzi and Nicola Porro).
机译:大流行问题在过去几个月中发挥的关键和垄断作用是我们可以观察到数字环境如何重塑整个交流空间的镜头。事实上,由于玩家的多种和异质性以及扩展他们的通信方式,后者不断变得更密集。从Bourdieu的“新闻领域”的概念开始,我们来到了一个新的形势,记者和公共部门的传播者的声音与许多其他行动者的声音与其他特定技能并排,他们构建了一个复态和多维交往空间。这种多方面的交流空间推动我们重新思考法国社会学家引入的正统和信息异端的类别,考虑到许多演员现在更有兴趣通过管理他们的不同通信资源来建立公众可见性。在这样做时,他们可以获得交际空间中的特殊角色和位置,其中透明度和“召开的”传派权力“变得更加重要。根据这些场所,本文旨在经验探索,在意大利锁定的第一次紧急阶段,公众辩论的10个不同的主要行为者如何管理其交流战略。为了测试此处提出的理论框架,作者调查了6种不同的通信资源:声誉,机构,专业,争论,表演和关系的。该分析侧重于以下Facebook账户的活动:民事保护,高等卫生研究所,总理,伦巴第地区,威尼托地区以及总理福特纳和Zaia的总理托盘,以及两位目前大多数人遵循社交媒体的记者(Andrea Scanzi和Nicola Porro)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号