首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Medicine and Science >Comparison of immunity against canine distemper, adenovirus and parvovirus after vaccination with two multivalent canine vaccines
【24h】

Comparison of immunity against canine distemper, adenovirus and parvovirus after vaccination with two multivalent canine vaccines

机译:两种多价犬疫苗疫苗接种后犬瘟热,腺病毒和细小病毒的抗扰度比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Viral diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in puppies. There is a belief among veterinary practitioners and even educational institutions that the vaccines made in Brazil against canine distemper virus (CDV), canine parvovirus (CPV) and canine adenovirus (CAV) are ineffective or only partially effective. Objectives This study aimed at comparing the immunity of two multivalent vaccines in adult dogs in the city of Uberlandia, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Methods The study was carried out at the Animal Protection Association and a total of 60 adult mongrel dogs were selected and divided into two groups. Group A was immunized with two doses of Elevencell? vaccine and Group B received two doses of imported vaccine from the United States; each group was made up of 14 females and 14 males. Results In group A, the Elevencell vaccine generated a protective antibody titre against CDV in 26 out of 28 subjects (92.85%), CPV in 24 out of 28 subjects (85.71%) and CAV in 26 out of 28 subjects (92.85%). In group B, the imported US vaccine generated a protective antibody titre against CDV in 22 out of 28 subjects (78.57), CPV in 21 out of 28 subjects (75%) and CAV in 25 out of 28 subjects (89.28%). There was no statistical difference between titres generated between vaccine types for any of the three diseases tested. Conclusion Elevencell vaccine titres were not inferior to the imported US vaccine in conferring protective titres against CDV, CPV and CAH, which confirms the efficacy of this product.
机译:背景技术病毒疾病是小狗发病率和死亡率的主要原因。兽医从业者甚至教育机构都有一种信念,即巴西对犬瘟热病毒(CDV)的疫苗,犬瓣病毒(CPV)和犬腺病毒(CAV)是无效的或仅部分有效的。目的这项研究旨在比较巴西·米纳斯吉拉斯州的成人狗两种多价疫苗的免疫力。方法该研究在动物保护协会进行,共选出60只成人杂种犬并分为两组。 A组被两剂综合链免疫?疫苗和B组来自美国的两剂进口疫苗;每组由14名女性和14名男性组成。结果A组,Elecentell疫苗在28个受试者(92.85%)中的26个受试者中的26例(92.85%),24个受试者中的24例(85.71%)和26个中的26个受试者中的24例(92.85%)中的24例产生保护抗体。在B组中,进口的美国疫苗在28个受试者(78.57)中,22例中的22例,21个受试者(75%)和25分中的21例中的21个受试者(89.28%)中的21例中产生保护抗体滴度。在测试的任何三种疾病之间存在疫苗类型之间产生的滴度之间没有统计学差异。结论Elevencell疫苗滴度不逊于进口美国疫苗,赋予CDV,CPV和CAH的保护性滴度,这证实了该产品的功效。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号