...
首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Evidence >In pregnant bitches, is elective caesarean section more effective than vaginal delivery at improving puppy survival?
【24h】

In pregnant bitches, is elective caesarean section more effective than vaginal delivery at improving puppy survival?

机译:在怀孕的母狗中,是选修剖面部分比改善小狗生存的阴道分娩更有效吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

PICO question In pregnant bitches due to whelp, is elective caesarean section more effective than vaginal delivery to improve puppy survival? ? Clinical bottom line Category of research question The category of the research question is regarding the incidence of puppy mortalities as a result of vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section and elective caesarean section. The number and type of study designs reviewed Two retrospective articles were reviewed and critically appraised; one retrospective study with high single canine breed bias and one study on different canine breeds but limited support in directly answering the PICO question. Strength of evidence The studies selected both had strong uses of experimental designs but together provided weak evidence to determine a definitive answer to the PICO question. Outcomes reported The outcomes from both retrospective studies suggests that the mortality rates of newborn puppies can be reduced if pregnant bitches are scheduled ahead for elective caesareans, in comparison to undergoing an emergency caesarean section when complications develop, particularly in breeds with higher risks of dystocia. Therefore, there is some evidence to support that it may be advantageous to consider the breed, age and overall health of the bitch during pregnancy to determine whether elective caesarean sections, for the safe delivery of puppies, should be considered. Conclusion There are currently insufficient studies, literatures and evidence in veterinary medicine for caesarean sections to become a routine procedure in first opinion practices. Future prospective studies should be conducted and include the optimum anaesthetic protocols with the lowest associated risks for the pregnant bitch and puppies. ? How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
机译:PICO问题在妊娠母犬由于下崽,是选择性剖宫产比阴道分娩更有效地提高生存的小狗?还是研究问题的临床底线分类研究问题的类别是关于死亡小狗的发病率是阴道分娩,紧急剖腹产手术和择期剖腹产的结果。数量和研究型的设计审查两个回顾性的文章进行了审查,并严格评价;一个回顾性研究具有较高的单犬犬种偏见和不同品种的狗一项研究,但没有直接回答问题PICO的支持有限。证据强度研究选择两个有实验设计的强大的用途,但共同设置的弱证据,以确定一个明确的答案PICO问题。成果报告从两个回顾性研究的结果表明,可如果怀孕的母狗被安排提前择期剖腹产,减少新生幼犬的死亡率相比,接受紧急剖腹产手术时的并发症的发展,特别是在难产的高风险品种。因此,有一些证据的支持,它可能是有利的考虑母狗的品种,年龄及整体健康状况在怀孕期间,以确定是否择期剖腹产,小狗的安全分娩,应予以考虑。结论目前没有足够的研究,文献和证据,兽药为剖腹产,成为第一种观点的做法例行程序。未来的前瞻性研究应进行,包括与怀孕的母狗和小狗最低的相关风险的最佳麻醉协议。还是如何在实践中应用这一证据的证据应考虑到多种因素,不仅限于:个人临床专业知识,患者的情况和所有者的价值观,国家,地点或诊所,您工作的个人案例您,疗法和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或通知决策的资源。他们不会覆盖从业者​​的责任或判断,以便在他们的照顾中做最适合动物的事情。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号