首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials
【24h】

Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials

机译:与干预试验相比,测试评估试验为审判管理者提供了不同的挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Test evaluation trials present different challenges for trial managers compared to intervention trials. There has been very little research on the management of test evaluation trials and how this impacts on trial success, in comparison with intervention trials. Evaluations of medical tests present specific challenges, because they are a pivot point bridging the complexities of pathways prompting testing with treatment decision-making. We systematically explored key differences in the trial design and management of test evaluation trials compared to intervention trials at the different stages of study design and delivery. We identified challenges in test evaluation trials that were more pronounced than in intervention trials, based on experience from 10 test evaluation trials. We formed a focus group of 7 trial managers and a statistician who had been involved in the day-to-day management of both test evaluation trials and intervention trials. We used discussion and content analysis to group challenges from 10 trials into a structured thematic format. The trials covered a range of medical conditions, diagnostic tests, clinical pathways and conditions including chronic kidney disease, chronic pelvic pain, colitis, detrusor over-activity, group B streptococcal colonisation, tuberculosis and colorectal, lung, ovarian and thyroid cancers. We identified 10 common themes underlying challenges that are more pronounced in test evaluation compared to intervention trials. We illustrate these themes with examples from 10 trials, including with 31 specific challenges we experienced. The themes were ethics/governance; accessing patient populations; recruitment; patient preference; test processes, clinical pathways and samples storage; uncertainty of diagnostic results; verifying diagnosis (reference standard); follow-up; adverse effects; and diagnostic impact. We present 10 common themes, including 31 challenges, in test evaluation trials that will be helpful to others designing and managing future test evaluation trials. Proactive identification of potential challenges at the design and planning stages of test evaluation trials will enable strategies to improve trial design and management that may be different from standard strategies used for intervention trials. Future work could extend this topic to include challenges for other trial stakeholders including participants, clinicians, statisticians and funders. All trials reviewed in this project were registered and are provided in Table?1.
机译:与干预试验相比,测试评估试验对审判管理者产生了不同的挑战。与干预试验相比,对测试评估试验的管理以及这种对审判成功的影响有何研究。医学测试的评估存在特定的挑战,因为它们是桥接途径促使用治疗决策测试的途径的复杂性。与不同阶段的研究设计和交付的不同阶段,我们系统地探讨了试验评估试验的试验设计和管理的关键差异。我们确定了测试评估试验中的挑战,这些试验比10个测试评估试验的经验更明显。我们组建了7名试验管理人员的焦点集团,也是一名统计学家,他们参与了考试评估试验和干预试验的日常管理。我们使用讨论和内容分析将10个试验中的挑战分析到结构化主题格式。试验涵盖了一系列医疗条件,诊断试验,临床途径和条件,包括慢性肾病,慢性盆腔疼痛,结肠炎,毒物过度活动,B组链球菌定植,结核病和结肠直肠,肺,卵巢和甲状腺癌。与干预试验相比,我们确定了在测试评估中更加明显的挑战的10个常见主题。我们用来自10项试验的例子说明了这些主题,包括我们经历了31种特定挑战。主题是道德/治理;访问患者人口;招聘;患者偏好;测试过程,临床途径和样品储存;诊断结果的不确定性;验证诊断(参考标准);跟进;不利影响;和诊断影响。我们提出了10个共同主题,其中包括31项挑战,在测试评估试验中,这将有助于他人设计和管理未来的测试评估试验。主动识别测试评估试验的设计和规划阶段的潜在挑战将使策略改善可能与用于干预试验的标准策略不同的试验设计和管理。未来的工作可以扩展这个话题,包括其他审判利益相关者,包括参与者,临床医生,统计人员和资助者的挑战。在该项目中审查的所有试验都已注册,并提供在表中提供?1。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号