首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco Prevention and Cessation >Tobacco Industry Interference Index FCTC Article 5.3 (Jordan case)
【24h】

Tobacco Industry Interference Index FCTC Article 5.3 (Jordan case)

机译:烟草业干涉指数FCTC第5.3条(约旦案例)

获取原文
       

摘要

The tobacco epidemic is on the rise in Jordan and defined as a public health emergency by the United Nations. Prevalence of tobacco smoking among adult males is estimated at 70.2%. Additionally, the prevalence is also high among youths aged 13–15 years; Tobacco consumption also affects secondhand smokers, with 68% of adults and 62% of youth exposed to secondhand tobacco smoking. Article 5.3 of the WHO FCTC calls on Parties to establish formal mechanisms to protect against tobacco industry influence with tobacco control policies. Jordan, despite being one of the first countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region to ratify the WHO FCTC has experienced continual interference from the tobacco industry. The tobacco industry has been pushing back against the implementation of tobacco control laws for decades. The objective of this report is to present a comprehensive summary and assessment of tobacco industry interference in Jordan, using the index developed by the Southeast Asia Tobacco Control Alliance. The index explores actions for the tobacco industry in 7 important areas (level of participation in policy development, CSR activities, forms of unnecessary interaction, preventive measurement, transparency, conflicts of interest, benefits to the tobacco industry).Conclusions and Recommendations:Since the ratification of the FCTC treaty in 2004, Jordan has shown evidence of some regulation of tobacco companies’ interactions, however, the index score shows that the level of industry interference is high (79@). When tobacco industry interference in Jordan is compared with other countries, the score is the same as Indonesia. No other country has a higher score, except for Japan. The leading causes for the industry and their front groups’ influence are the lack of laws or regulations that: ? Prohibit accepting support and sponsorship to various projects and causes, from tobacco industry through CSR activities. ? Provide transparency. ? Limit their interaction with governmental employees. ? Forces employees to disclose all meetings and necessary interactions with the industry. ? Prohibit all governmental representatives from accepting gifts/support from the industry. ? Prohibit tobacco industry from participation in policy level decisions. ? Prohibits government representatives from endorsing/supporting tobacco industry initiatives.
机译:烟草疫情正在约旦上升,并被联合国视为公共卫生紧急情况。成年男性中烟草吸烟的患病率估计为70.2%。此外,在13-15岁的年轻人中,流行也很高;烟草消费量也影响二手吸烟者,68%的成年人和62%的青年暴露在二手烟草吸烟。第5.3条世卫组织FCTC呼吁各方建立正式机制,以防止烟草行业与烟草控制政策影响。尽管成为世界卫生组织地中海地区的第一个国家之一,但批准了WHO FCTC的烟草业经历了不断干扰的国家。烟草业一直在推动烟草控制法的实施数十年。本报告的目的是展示烟草行业干扰的全面摘要和评估,利用东南亚烟草控制联盟开发的指数。该指数探讨了7个重要领域的烟草业的行动(参与政策制定,CSR活动,不必要的互动形式,预防性测量,透明度,利益冲突,烟草业的福利).Conclus和建议:自从批准2004年的FCTC条约,约旦表明了一些规定烟草公司的相互作用的证据,然而,指数分数表明产业干涉水平高(79 @)。当烟草行业干扰约旦与其他国家相比,得分与印度尼西亚相同。除日本外,没有其他国家的得分更高。行业的主要原因及其前群体的影响是缺乏法律或法规:?通过CSR活动从烟草行业禁止接受支持和赞助各个项目和原因。还是提供透明度。还是限制他们与政府员工的互动。还是迫使员工披露所有会议和与该行业的必要互动。还是禁止所有政府代表接受行业的礼品/支持。还是禁止烟草行业从参与政策层面决定。还是禁止政府代表赞同/支持烟草行业举措。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号