首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy
【24h】

Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy

机译:明确同时化疗治疗局部晚期肺癌患者的图像引导放射治疗的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an advanced radiotherapy technique to improve the precision and accuracy of treatment delivery. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy via either IGRT or routine care reported statistically significantly worse overall survival (OS) for those patients treated with IGRT. This raised the concern regarding the effectiveness of IGRT in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) for locally advanced lung cancer (LALC).METHODS:Eligible LALC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2016 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of death and other outcomes were compared between IGRT and non-IGRT. We also evaluated OS in various subgroups.RESULTS:Our primary analysis consisted of 797 patients in whom covariates were well balanced after PS weighing. The HR for death when IGRT was compared with non-IGRT was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.79-1.15, P = 0.65). There were also no significant differences for most of the other outcomes or subgroup analyses.CONCLUSIONS:In this updated nonrandomized study, we found that OS of LALC patients treated with dCCRT was not statistically different between those treated with IGRT versus non-IGRT. The results should be interpreted with caution given the nonrandomized design. Studies regarding toxicity, local control, or designed as RCT are needed to clarify the role of IGRT.KEY POINTS:SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The OS of LALC patients treated with dCCRT was not statistically different between those treated with IGRT versus those without IGRT, although the observed HR for death was less than unity (ie, in favor of IGRT).WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:In this updated nonrandomized study using real world data with additional potential confounders, our study provided a reasonable tentative evidence in the lack of RCT as suggested in the literature.? 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
机译:背景:图像引导放射疗法(IGRT)是一种先进的放射疗法,提高治疗递送的精度和准确性。最近通过IGRT或常规护理治疗的前列腺癌患者的近期随机对照试验(RCT)报告了用IGRT治疗的那些患者的总体存活率(OS)统计学显着差。这提出了对局部晚期肺癌(LALC)的明确同步化学疗法(DCCRT)中IGRT的有效性的担忧。方法:通过台湾癌症登记处确定了2011年和2016年诊断的符合条件的LALC患者。我们使用倾向评分(PS)加权来平衡群体之间的可观察潜在的混音。在Igrt和非I​​grt之间比较了死亡和其他结果的危害比(HR)。我们还在各个亚组中进行了评估的操作系统。结果:我们的主要分析包括797名患者,在PS称量后协变量平衡。当IGRT与非IGRT比较IGRT时死亡的HR为0.96(95%置信区间0.79-1.15,P = 0.65)。对于大多数其他结果或亚组分析也没有显着差异。结论:在这种更新的非扫描研究中,我们发现用Igrt与非Igrt和非I​​grt和非I​​grt的那些,使用Dccrt治疗的LALC患者的OS没有统计学不同。考虑到非扫描设计,应谨慎解释结果。需要研究毒性,局部控制或设计RCT,以澄清IGRT.KEY点的作用:研究的重要发现:用DCCR治疗的LALC患者的OS在IGRT与那些没有IGRT的IGRT的人之间没有统计学不同但是,虽然观察到的死亡的人力不低(即,赞成IGRT)。本研究补充说:在这个更新的非andomized研究中,使用现实世界数据具有额外的潜在混杂者,我们的研究提供了合理的初步证据正如文献中所建议的RCT。? 2020作者。中国肺部肿瘤集团和约翰瓦里和儿子澳大利亚发表的胸癌

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号