...
首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Superior efficacy of immunotherapy‐based combinations over monotherapy for EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs
【24h】

Superior efficacy of immunotherapy‐based combinations over monotherapy for EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs

机译:卓越的免疫疗法组合对单药治疗的优越疗效,对EGFR-突变体非小细胞肺癌获得抗EGFR-TKIS的抗性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background While prospective clinical studies on immunotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are ongoing, this study aimed to investigate the outcomes of immunotherapy combinations in such a population in a real‐world setting. Methods The clinical data of pretreated EGFR ‐mutated NSCLC patients who acquired EGFR‐TKI resistance and received immunotherapy were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was assessed using the Kaplan‐Meier log‐rank test, and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results A total of 31 patients were analyzed in this study. A total of 25 (80.6%) patients received combination immunotherapy. In the univariate analysis, patients who received combination immunotherapy seemingly acquired longer PFS than those who received monotherapy, although there was no significant difference (3.42?months vs. 1.61; P = 0.078; hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16–1.13). Patients who received antiangiogenic drugs prior to immunotherapy acquired better PFS (3.42?months vs. 1.58; P = 0.027; HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15–0.93), while patients with liver metastasis had inferior PFS (2.04?months vs. 3.42; P = 0.031; HR 2.83, 95% CI: 1.05–7.60). Furthermore, multivariate analysis confirmed that the above three factors had independent prognostic value. Conclusions The study revealed that immunotherapy combinations are better choices than single‐agent regimens in previously treated and EGFR ‐mutant NSCLC patients with progressive disease. In addition, antiangiogenic drugs administered before immunotherapy might be a favorable prognostic factor, while liver metastasis was associated with a short PFS in this setting. In future, more robust and prospective clinical trial results are expected to guide clinical practice. Key points Significant study findings Immunotherapy‐based combination therapies are better choices than single‐agent regimens in heavily treated EGFR ‐mutant NSCLC patients. What this study adds Patients without liver metastasis and with prior antiangiogenic drugs obtained more benefit from immunotherapy in this setting.
机译:背景虽然与获得性抗性对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变体的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的免疫治疗的前瞻性临床研究,以EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)正在进行,本研究的目的是调查免疫治疗组合的结果在真实世界设定这样的人口。方法预处理EGFR的临床数据-mutated谁收购了EGFR-TKI阻力并获得免疫治疗在这项研究进行回顾性分析NSCLC患者。无进展生存期(PFS)采用Kaplan-Meier生存数秩检验评估,并进行单因素和多因素分析。结果共有31例患者在这项研究进行了分析。共有25个(80.6%)患者接受组合免疫疗法。在单变量分析中,谁收到组合免疫疗法的患者似乎获取比那些谁收到单一疗法较长PFS,虽然没有显著差异(3.42个月与1.61; P = 0.078;风险比(HR)0.43,95%CI:0.16 -1.13)。谁收到前免疫抗血管生成药物的患者取得了较好的PFS(3.42个月和1.58; P = 0.027; HR 0.37,95%CI:0.15-0.93)?,而患者的肝转移具有较差的PFS(2.04个月和3.42 ; P = 0.031; HR 2.83; 95%CI:1.05-7.60)。此外,多变量分析证实,上述三个因素具有独立的预后价值。结论:该研究显示,免疫疗法的组合在以前治疗和EGFR -mutant NSCLC患者疾病进展比单药治疗方案更好的选择。此外,免疫治疗前给予抗血管生成药物可能是一个良好的预后因素,而肝转移与在此设置一个较短的PFS相关。在未来,更强大和前瞻性的临床试验结果预计将指导临床实践。要点重大研究结果基于免疫疗法的联合疗法比在重治疗EGFR -mutant NSCLC患者单药治疗方案更好的选择。什么这项研究增加了患者无肝转移和事先抗血管生成药物在此设置获得从免疫更多的好处。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号