...
首页> 外文期刊>Thoracic cancer. >Efficacy and safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first‐line treatment for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first‐line treatment for extensive‐stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

机译:PD-1 / PD-L1抑制剂的功效和安全性Plus化疗与化疗单独作为一种广泛阶段小细胞肺癌的一线治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Immunotherapy has afforded new treatment options for extensive small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC). However, reports on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy on survival in ES‐SCLC patients are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a meta‐analysis on the efficacy and safety of ICI combined with chemotherapy for ES‐SCLC. Methods We searched for randomized controlled clinical trials related to first‐line treatment of ES‐SCLC with ICI combined with chemotherapy in PUBMED, ESMO, ASCO, and WCLC since 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results Four studies were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, ICI in combination with chemotherapy as first‐line treatment reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68–0.86; P ?0.00001) and disease progression (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.68–0.84; P ?0.00001). The objective response rate (ORR) with ICI plus chemotherapy was significantly higher than that with chemotherapy alone (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.02–1.19, P = 0.01). The duration of response (DoR) rate at one year was also better with ICI plus chemotherapy (HR: 3.46; 95% CI: 2.24–5.33; P ?0.00001). Security analysis revealed that the incidence of immune‐mediated adverse events (imAEs) (HR: 3.77; 95% CI: 1.99–7.15, P 0.0001) and grade 3/4 imAEs (HR: 7.01; 95% CI: 2.48–19.81; P = 0.0002) increased significantly with ICI plus chemotherapy. Conclusions ICI combined with chemotherapy as first‐line treatment can significantly improve the OS and progression‐free survival (PFS) of ES‐SCLC patients, but the toxicity caused by immunotherapy should be carefully considered. Key points Significant findings of the studyOur meta‐analysis shows that PD‐L1/PD‐1 plus chemotherapy can significantly improve the OS and PFS of ES‐SCLC patients when used as first‐line therapy. What this study adds This study fills gaps regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as first‐line treatment for ES‐SCLC, and provides better evidence for the use of PD‐L1/PD‐1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy for patients with ES‐SCLC.
机译:背景技术免疫疗法为广泛的小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)提供了新的治疗选择。但是,关于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIS)的有效性与化疗对ES-SCLC患者存活的报告不一致。因此,我们对ICI的疗效和安全性与ES-SCLC的化疗相结合进行了荟萃分析。方法从2018年以来,我们搜索了与ICI的初始治疗与ICI联合化疗的随机对照临床试验。主要结果是总生存(OS)。结果包括四项研究。与单独的化疗相比,ICI与化疗结合为一线治疗,降低了死亡风险(危害比[HR]:0.76; 95%CI; 0.68-0.86; P <0.00001)和疾病进展(HR:0.76; 95%CI:0.68-0.84; P <0.00001)。使用ICI加上化学疗法的客观反应率(ORR)显着高于单独化疗(HR:1.10; 95%CI:1.02-1.19,P = 0.01)。 ICI Plus化疗(HR:3.46; 95%CI:2.24-5.33; P <0.00001),响应持续时间(DOR)率也更好。安全分析显示免疫介导的不良事件(IMAE)的发生率(HR:3.77; 95%CI:1.99-7.15,P <0.0001)和3/4 IMAE(HR:7.01; 95%CI:2.48-19.81 ; P = 0.0002)随着ICI加上化疗显着增加。结论ICI联合化疗作为一线治疗可以显着改善ES-SCLC患者的OS和无进展生存(PFS),但应仔细考虑免疫疗法引起的毒性。研究阅览我们的研究阅类间评分的主要发现表明,PD-L1 / PD-1加上化疗可以在用作初系治疗时显着改善ES-SCLC患者的OS和PFS。本研究添加本研究填补了免疫疗法的疗效与化疗为ES-SCLC的一线治疗的差距,并提供了使用PD-L1 / PD-1免疫疗法加上ES-SCLC患者的更好证据。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号