...
首页> 外文期刊>The Professional Medical Journal >Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau (PAP) Smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma, taking biopsy as gold standard.
【24h】

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau (PAP) Smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma, taking biopsy as gold standard.

机译:醋酸(VIA)在宫颈癌筛选中帕帕内尼碱(PAP)涂抹和目视检测的比较宫颈癌,采用活检作为金标准。

获取原文

摘要

Study Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. Period: 05 August 2016 to 05 Feb 2017. Material & Methods: A total of 228 suspected patients of cervical carcinoma and age of 20-50 years were included. Patients with acute cervicitis, pregnant females, h/o abnormal cytology and obvious lesion on cervix were excluded. All the patients were underwent papanicoloau (PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid. The results of papanicoloau (PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) were compared with cervical biopsy report. Results: In 110 papanicoloau (PAP) smear positive patients, 97 were True Positive and 13 were False Positive. Among, 118 papanicoloau (PAP) smear negative patients, 18 were False Negative whereas 100 were True Negative. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of papanicoloau ( PAP )smear in screening of cervical carcinoma was 84.35%, 88.50%, 88.18%, 84.75% and 86.40% respectively. In 114 visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) positive patients, 95 were True Positive and 19 were False Positive. Among, 114 visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) negative patients, 20 were False Negative whereas 94 were True Negative. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection using acetic acid ( VIA) in? screening of cervical carcinoma was 82.61%, 83.19%, 83.33% 82.46% and 82.89% respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded that papanicoloau ( PAP) smear and visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) in screening of cervical carcinoma are highly sensitive, accurate and having almost equal diagnostic accuracy.
机译:研究设计:横截面描述性研究。环境:巴哈瓦尔普省巴拉瓦尔维多利亚医院妇产科系。期:2016年8月5日至2月5日至2月5日。材料和方法:包括228名涉嫌宫颈癌患者和20-50岁。患有急性宫颈炎,怀孕女性,H / O异常细胞学和宫颈上明显病变的患者被排除在外。所有患者均经过帕帕米菌(PAP)涂抹和使用醋酸的目视检查。使用醋酸(VEA)的帕帕内尼索洛(PAP)涂抹和目视检查的结果与宫颈活检报告进行了比较。结果:110帕帕尼菌(PAP)涂片阳性患者,97例是真正的阳性,13个是假阳性。其中118帕帕尼菌(PAP)涂抹阴性患者,18例是假阴性,而100是真实的阴性。在筛查宫颈癌筛查中帕巴尼碱(PAP)涂片的总体敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和诊断准确性为84.35%,88.50%,88.18%,84.75%和86.40%。在114使用醋酸(通过)阳性患者的目视检查中,95例为真阳性,19个是假阳性的。其中114使用醋酸(孔)阴性患者的目视检查,20例为假阴性,而94是真实的阴性。使用乙酸(VIA)的整体敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,阴性预测值和视觉检查的诊断准确性?宫颈癌的筛选分别为82.61%,83.19%,83.33%82.46%和82.89%。结论:本研究得出结论,帕帕内尼索洛(PAP)使用醋酸(孔)在筛查宫颈癌中的涂抹和目视检查是高度敏感的,准确的,并且具有几乎相同的诊断准确性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号