...
首页> 外文期刊>The Professional Medical Journal >Comparison of outcome of two plate fixation with one plate fixation along with arch bar in management of parasymphysis; A Randomized Control Trial.
【24h】

Comparison of outcome of two plate fixation with one plate fixation along with arch bar in management of parasymphysis; A Randomized Control Trial.

机译:用一块板固定的两种平板固定的结果比较诉讼中的拱杆癌杆菌;随机控制试验。

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare two plate fixation and one plate along with arch bar in the treatment of parasymphsis, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages over one another. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial. Setting: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sardar Begam Dental College and Northwest General Hospital Peshawar. Period: Over a period of one year from June 2017 to August 2018. Material & Methods: 60 patients with parasymphysis fracture after diagnosis established on clinical and radiological examination were equally divided into two groups, 30 patients in each. Group (A) were treated with two miniplates, while Group (B) one miniplate along with arch ?bar under general anesthesia with proper antibiotics coverage in the pre- and post-operative period. Results: The infection rate 4 (13.3%) patients in Group B while 0 in Group A. No Loosening /fracture of screw or plate occur in any subject in group A at any follow up visit, while it occurred in 4 subjects in group B at 15 days follow up period. 9 patients in Group A and 6 in Group B presented with immediate post of paresthesia, which was reduced to 7 patients in group A and 6 in group B at 15 days follow up, and to 4 patients in Group A and 5 in Group B at 1 month follow up. Similarly, no subject had inferior border misalignment in group A at any follow up period while 3 subjects have immediate post -op inferior border discrepancy in group B and 6 subjects in the same group shows inferior border discrepancy at 15 days , but the overall result of this variable was also statistically non-significant. Conclusion: Isolated mandibular parasymphysis fracture can be treated with either two miniplates or one miniplate along with arch bar for 6 weeks. Both treatment protocol shows advantages and disadvantages with the aim of achieving the best treatment outcome for the patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是将两个板固定和一块板与拱形栏进行比较,并在诉讼映像中与彼此分析的优点和缺点。研究设计:随机临床试验。环境:口腔颌面外科萨达尔·初级牙科学院和西北综合医院Peshawar。期限:从2017年6月到2018年8月的一年。材料和方法:在临床和放射检查中建立的诊断后60例副血小面症患者均分为两组,每组30名患者。组(A)用两个小柱处理,而组(b)一组微型与拱门在一起的拱门?在术前和术后期间具有适当的抗生素覆盖。结果:B组患者的感染率4(13.3%)患者患者组中的0次。在任何后续访问的任何受试者中没有螺钉或板块的松动/骨折发生,而在B组的4个受试者中发生在15天后跟进。 9患者A组和B组患者呈现出直系亲的感觉术后,在15天后,B组A和6次患者减少到7名患者,并在B组和B组中的4名患者1个月跟进。同样,在任何后续期间没有受试者在A组中存在较差的边界未对准,而3个受试者在B组和同一组的6个受试者中立即发布次要边界差异,则在15天内显示劣质边界差异,但总体结果该变量也存在统计学上不显着。结论:分离的下颌血小面肛门骨折可以用两个小柱或一个微型和一个微型和拱形杆处理6周。两种治疗方案都表现出优缺点,目的是实现患者的最佳治疗结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号