...
首页> 外文期刊>The Open Infectious Diseases Journal >Clarithromycin versus Amoxicillin alone or with Clavulanate in Acute Maxillary Sinusitis: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
【24h】

Clarithromycin versus Amoxicillin alone or with Clavulanate in Acute Maxillary Sinusitis: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials

机译:克拉霉素与阿莫西林单独或用克拉维酸盐在急性上颌窦炎中:临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: A meta-analysis was performed to explore the relative effects of clarithromycin and amoxicillin (with or without clavulanate potassium) in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Methods: Six studies were identified in the peer-reviewed literature. All were randomized single-blind (investigator-blind) or open-label trials in outpatients diagnosed with acute maxillary sinusitis. A total of 1580 patients were enrolled, of whom 1194 were clinically evaluable. The total daily dose of clarithromycin was 1000 mg; the total daily dose of amoxicillin (with or without clavulanate potassium) was either 1500 or 2000 mg. The duration of study drug treatment varied from 8 to 14 days. Endpoints comprised clinical and radiological success within 48 h of the end of study drug treatment plus bacteriologic cure and eradication. Success and cure rate differences were analyzed using fixed- and random-effect models. The absence of between-study heterogeneity was tested using Cochran’s Q-test. Results: Clinical success rates varied between 85.8% and 97.9% for clarithromycin and between 84.2% and 96.8% for amoxicillin. The combined rate difference in clinical success rates between clarithromycin and amoxicillin was +1.9% (P=0.14). Radiological success rates (four studies) varied from 78.2% to 94.0% for clarithromycin and 79.7% to 95.0% for amoxicillin, with a combined rate difference of zero (P=1.00). Bacteriologic cure rates (four studies) were 87.1–94.6% for clarithromycin, compared with 89.8–98.1% for amoxicillin, with a combined difference in cure rates of –3.2% (P=0.16). Overall bacterial eradication rates were comparable between the two treatments (clarithromycin, 89.3%; amoxicillin, 92.1%). Conclusion: These data, with their limitations properly acknowledged, identify clarithromycin as a valid and viable alternative to amoxicillin for the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis in adults.
机译:目的:进行META分析,探讨克拉霉素和阿莫西林(有或没有克拉氨酸钾)治疗急性上颌窦炎的相对效果。方法:在同行评审文献中确定了六项研究。所有在诊断出急性上颌窦炎的门诊患家中都是随机的单盲(调查症)或开放标签试验。共有1580名患者,其中1194名临床评价。每日克拉霉素的总剂量为1000毫克; Amoxicillin的总剂量(有或没有克拉氨酸钾)为1500或2000mg。研究药物治疗的持续时间从8-14天变化。终点包括在研究药物治疗结束时48小时内的临床和放射性成功加上细菌治疗和根除。使用固定和随机效应模型分析了成功和治愈率差异。使用Cochran的Q-Test测试缺乏研究之间的异质性。结果:临床成功率为克拉霉素的85.8%和97.9%,均为阿莫西林的84.2%和96.8%。克拉霉素和阿莫西林之间的临床成功率的组合率差异为+ 1.9%(p = 0.14)。放射性成功率(四项研究)对于克拉霉素的78.2%至94.0%,Amoxicillin的79.7%至95.0%,零率为零(P = 1.00)。克拉霉素的细菌性固化率(四项研究)为87.1-94.6%,而Amoxicillin的89.8-98.1%相比,固化率的差异为-3.2%(p = 0.16)。两种治疗(克拉霉素,89.3%; Amoxicillin,92.1%)之间的整体细菌根除率可相当。结论:这些数据具有适当确认的局限性,将克拉霉素鉴定为Amoxicillin的有效和可行的替代品,用于治疗成人中急性上颌窦炎。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号