...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Public Health >The effect of food taxes and subsidies on population health and health costs: a modelling study
【24h】

The effect of food taxes and subsidies on population health and health costs: a modelling study

机译:粮食税和补贴对人口健康和健康成本的影响:建模研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundOne possible policy response to the burden of diet-related disease is food taxes and subsidies, but the net health gains of these approaches are uncertain because of substitution effects between foods. We estimated the health and cost impacts of various food taxes and subsidies in one high-income country, New Zealand.MethodsIn this modelling study, we compared the effects in New Zealand of a 20% fruit and vegetable subsidy, of saturated fat, sugar and salt taxes (each set at a level that increased the total food price by the same magnitude of decrease from the fruit and vegetable subsidy), and of an 8% so-called junk food tax (on non-essential, energy-dense food). We modelled the effect of price changes on food purchases, the consequent changes in fruit and vegetable and sugar-sweetened beverage purchasing, nutrient risk factors, and body-mass index, and how these changes affect health status and health expenditure. The pre-intervention intake for 340 food groups was taken from the New Zealand National Nutrition Survey and the post-intervention intake was estimated using price and expenditure elasticities. The resultant changes in dietary risk factors were then propagated through a proportional multistate lifetable (with 17 diet-related diseases) to estimate the changes in health-adjusted life years (HALYs) and health system expenditure over the 2011 New Zealand population's remaining lifespan.FindingsHealth gains (expressed in HALYs per 1000 people) ranged from 127 (95% uncertainty interval 96–167; undiscounted) for the 8% junk food tax and 212 (102–297) for the fruit and vegetable subsidy, up to 361 (275–474) for the saturated fat tax, 375 (272–508) for the salt tax, and 581 (429–792) for the sugar tax. Health expenditure savings across the remaining lifespan per capita (at a 3% discount rate) ranged from US$492 (334–694) for the junk food tax to $2164 (1472–3122) for the sugar tax.InterpretationThe large magnitude of the health gains and cost savings of these modelled taxes and subsidies suggests that their use warrants serious policy consideration.FundingHealth Research Council of New Zealand.
机译:背景技术对饮食有关的疾病负担的政策反应是粮食税和补贴,但由于食物之间的替代效应,这些方法的净健康收益是不确定的。我们估计各种粮食税和补贴在一家高收入国家,新西兰的健康状况和成本影响。关于这种建模研究,我们将新西兰的效果与饱和脂肪,糖和糖类补贴的20%果实和蔬菜补贴进行了比较了新西兰。盐税(每次设定在水果和蔬菜补贴中增加了同样的食品价格,也是8%所谓的垃圾食品税(非必要,能量密集食品) 。我们建模了价格变化对食品采购的影响,因此水果和蔬菜和糖加糖饮料采购,营养危险因素和体重指数的变化,以及这些变化如何影响健康状况和保健支出。 340个食物群体的干预前摄入量从新西兰国家营养调查中取出,使用价格和支出弹性估算了干预后摄入量。然后通过比例多态寿命(具有17个饮食相关疾病)繁殖膳食危险因素的变化,以估计2011年新西兰人口剩余的寿命的健康调整后生命年份(哈利)和卫生系统支出的变化.FindingsHealth收益(以每1000人的哈尔半人表示)为127(95%的不确定性间隔96-167;未被纪念)为8%的垃圾食品税和212(102-297),适用于水果和蔬菜补贴,高达361(275- 474)对于盐税的饱和脂肪税,375(272-508),以及糖税的581(429-792)。健康支出在剩余的人均寿命(以3%的折扣率)储蓄的价格为492美元(334-694),为垃圾税为2164美元(1472-3122),用于糖税。Interpretation健康收益的巨大程度这些建模税和补贴的成本节约表明,其使用保证了严重的政策考虑。新西兰的财务研究委员会。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号