首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet Public Health >Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study
【24h】

Quarantine and testing strategies in contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study

机译:用于SARS-COV-2的接触跟踪中的检疫和测试策略:建模研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundIn most countries, contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases are asked to quarantine for 14 days after exposure to limit asymptomatic onward transmission. While theoretically effective, this policy places a substantial social and economic burden on both the individual and wider society, which might result in low adherence and reduced policy effectiveness. We aimed to assess the merit of testing contacts to avert onward transmission and to replace or reduce the length of quarantine for uninfected contacts.MethodsWe used an agent-based model to simulate the viral load dynamics of exposed contacts, and their potential for onward transmission in different quarantine and testing strategies. We compared the performance of quarantines of differing durations, testing with either PCR or lateral flow antigen (LFA) tests at the end of quarantine, and daily LFA testing without quarantine, against the current 14-day quarantine strategy. We also investigated the effect of contact tracing delays and adherence to both quarantine and self-isolation on the effectiveness of each strategy.FindingsAssuming moderate levels of adherence to quarantine and self-isolation, self-isolation on symptom onset alone can prevent 37% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 12–56) of onward transmission potential from secondary cases. 14 days of post-exposure quarantine reduces transmission by 59% (95% UI 28–79). Quarantine with release after a negative PCR test 7 days after exposure might avert a similar proportion (54%, 95% UI 31–81; risk ratio [RR] 0·94, 95% UI 0·62–1·24) to that of the 14-day quarantine period, as would quarantine with a negative LFA test 7 days after exposure (50%, 95% UI 28–77; RR 0·88, 0·66–1·11) or daily testing without quarantine for 5 days after tracing (50%, 95% UI 23–81; RR 0·88, 0·60–1·43) if all tests are returned negative. A stronger effect might be possible if individuals isolate more strictly after a positive test and if contacts can be notified faster.InterpretationTesting might allow for a substantial reduction in the length of, or replacement of, quarantine with a small excess in transmission risk. Decreasing test and trace delays and increasing adherence will further increase the effectiveness of these strategies. Further research is required to empirically evaluate the potential costs (increased transmission risk, false reassurance) and benefits (reduction in the burden of quarantine, increased adherence) of such strategies before adoption as policy.FundingNational Institute for Health Research, UK Research and Innovation, Wellcome Trust, EU Horizon 2021, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
机译:背景,大多数国家,在暴露后14天内要求确认的Covid-19案件的联系人定期限制无症状的上市传输。虽然从理论上有效地,这一政策就个人和更广泛的社会奠定了实质性和经济的负担,这可能导致低依从性和降低的政策效果。我们旨在评估测试触点以避免向外传输并替换或减少未感染的联系人的隔离长度的优点。方法使用基于代理的模型来模拟暴露触点的病毒荷载动力学,以及它们的向内传输的可能性。不同的隔离和测试策略。我们比较了不同持续时间的检疫性的性能,在检疫结束时使用PCR或横向流动抗原(LFA)测试,以及每日LFA测试,无菌无检疫,违反当前的14天检疫策略。我们还调查了接触追踪延误和依从检疫和自隔离的效果对每种策略的有效性.FindingsAssuming适度的依从性和自我隔离,单独症状发作的自隔离可以预防37%(95次要案例的向上传输电位%不确定性间隔[UI] 12-56)。 14天的曝光后检疫减少59%(95%UI 28-79)。在暴露后7天后检疫释放后7天可能避免类似比例(54%,95%UI 31-81;风险比[RR] 0·94,95%UI 0·62-1·24)在14天检疫期间,由于接触后7天(50%,95%UI 28-77; RR 0·88,0·66-1·11)或每日测试,因此在没有隔离的日常测试的情况下检疫跟踪后5天(50%,95%UI 23-81; RR 0·88,0·60-1·43),如果所有测试都返回负数。如果个体在正面测试之后更严格地隔离并且如果可以更快地通知联系人,则可能是可能的更强的效果。InterpretationTationTingting可能允许在传输风险中具有少量过量的隔离度或更换隔离的长度减少。降低测试和追踪延迟以及增加遵守将进一步提高这些策略的有效性。需要进一步的研究以明确评估潜在成本(增加传播风险,虚假保证)和福利(减少检疫负担,增加了在作为政策的政策之前的这种战略的策略。英国研究和创新研究所,惠康信托,欧盟Horizo​​ n 2021,以及比尔&Melinda Gates基金会。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号