...
首页> 外文期刊>The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics >Technical efficiency comparison of container ports in Asian and Middle East region using DEA
【24h】

Technical efficiency comparison of container ports in Asian and Middle East region using DEA

机译:使用DEA的亚洲和中东地区集装箱港口的技术效率比较

获取原文

摘要

With the instigation of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), the strategic significance of South Asian and Middle Eastern ports have been vitalized. The aim of this study is to compare the technical efficiency of less explored South Asian & Middle Eastern ports with the East Asian ports and determine ways for their efficiency enhancement and management optimization. The cross sectional data for the year 2018 was collected for 15 container ports each of South & Middle Eastern and East Asian region and arranged into input and output variables. The data was analyzed through the DEA-CCR and DEA-BCC model. Results indicate that only one port each from UAE and India among the Middle & South Asian ports were found efficient on CCR model with the number of efficient ports on BCC model increased by 47%. While, in East Asian region two ports of China and one of South Korea were found efficient on CCR model, with 33% increase on BCC model. Lianyungang port was the most prominent among the efficient ports being highly benchmarked. The average efficiency for East Asian region (CCR: 0.524, BCC: 0.901) remained similar to that of South Asian and Middle East Region (CCR: 0.517, BCC: 0.906).
机译:随着中国巴基斯坦经济走廊(CPEC)的煽动,南亚和中东港口的战略意义得到了活力。本研究的目的是比较与东亚港口较少探索的南亚和中东港口的技术效率,并确定其效率提升和管理优化的方法。 2018年的横断面数据是收集了南部和中东和东亚地区的15个集装箱港口,并安排进入和输出变量。通过DEA-CCR和DEA-BCC模型分析数据。结果表明,在中南亚洲港口中,只有一个港口来自阿联酋和印度,在CCR模型中发现了高效港口数量的高效港口,增加了47%。虽然,在东亚地区中国和韩国之一的中国和韩国之一的CCR模型中有效,但BCC模型增加了33%。连云港港是高效港口中最突出的高度基准。东亚地区的平均效率(CCR:0.524,BCC:0.901)仍然与南亚和中东地区(CCR:0.517,BCC:0.906)相似。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号