...
首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology >Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study.
【24h】

Efficacy of Ephedrine Versus Lignocaine Pretreatment In Preventing Pain Following Propofol Injection: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study.

机译:偏黄素对木质科因对疼痛预处理的疗效在异丙酚注射后预处理:前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Injection pain and hypotension are the two main adverse effects of propofol. The commonly used lignocaine pretreatment for reducing injection pain has a failure rate between 13- 32 %. There are few studies in literature using ephedrine pretreatment for reduction of propofol injection pain and these studies have also looked at the effect of ephedrine in overcoming hypotension and hemodynamic stability, each with varying results. We studied the effect of ephedrine 50μg/kg pretreatment on prevention of propofol injection pain and hemodynamics.Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethical committee approval. Patients (eighty one patients) were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Each group consisting 27 (n= 27) patients were to receive one of lignocaine (Group L, n = 27), normal saline (Group S, n = 27) or ephedrine (Group E, n = 27) as pretreatment. Group L- pretreatment with 2% lignocaine 2 ml. Group S- pretreatment with 0.9% normal saline 2ml, Group E- pretreatment with ephedrine 50 μg/kg body weight diluted in normal saline into a 2 ml normal saline solution. Propofol was injected 30 sec later. A blinded researcher assessed the patient's pain level using a four point verbal rating scale.Results: There was no significant difference with respect to patient's characteristics and hemodynamic changes during propofol induction among the three groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of pain between groups. Patients who received lignocaine pretreatment group had 51.8% pain. The Normal saline pretreatment group had 77.8% pain. Ephedrine pretreatment group had pain as high as 70.4 %.Conclusion: Ephedrine used as pretreatment in dose of 50 μg/kg is neither useful to decrease propofol injection pain nor to maintain better hemodynamic. Introduction With the increasing quality and safety of anesthesia and perioperative care patient satisfaction is one of the top priorities of the anesthesiologist. Propofol is an intravenous (IV) sedative and hypnotic agent commonly used for anesthesia induction; injection pain and hypotension are the two main adverse effects of propofol. The pain on injection of propofol interferes with the patient satisfaction, with incidence between 40-86% (1). Propofol belongs to the group of sterically hindered phenols and injection pain is thought to be mediated by endothelial kinin release (2). Ephedrine is proposed to decrease the release of pain mediators from the vascular endothelium (3).There are few studies using ephedrine pretreatment for reduction of propofol injection pain with variable results. This study was under taken to study the effect of ephedrine 50μg/kg pretreatment on prevention of propofol injection pain and hemodynamic effects. Methods A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, study was undertaken after institutional ethical committee approval. Eighty one consented patients of either gender, in age groups 18-50 yrs, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II who were scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia were included in the study. Patients with history of allergy to propofol, patients taking sedatives or analgesics 24 hrs prior to the surgery, neurological or cardiovascular disease, obesity, difficult airway and pregnant female patients were excluded from the study.Patients were allocated to one of three groups according to the random numbers generated by statistical software. Each group consisting of 27 (n= 27) patients, was to receive one of the lignocaine (Group L, n = 27), normal saline (Group S, n = 27) or ephedrine (Group E, n = 27) as pretreatment. Group L- pretreatment with 2% lignocaine 2 ml, Group S- pretreatment with 0.9% normal saline 2ml, Group E- pretreatment with ephedrine 50 μg/kg body weight diluted in normal saline into a 2 ml normal saline solution. All syringes of pretreatment
机译:背景:注射痛和低血压的异丙酚的两个主要不利影响。用于减少注射疼痛常用利诺卡预处理之间具有13- 32%的失败率。有麻黄素使用预处理减轻异丙酚注射痛的文献很少研究,这些研究也克服低血压和血流动力学稳定,分别设定不同的结果看着麻黄碱的作用。我们研究的作用麻黄素为50μg/ kg的预处理预防异丙酚注射痛和hemodynamics.Methods:本前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究获得机构伦理委员会批准后进行。患者(81例),随机分为三组。由27(N = 27)各组患者均接受利多卡因中的一个(L组中,n = 27),生理盐水(集团S,N = 27)或麻黄碱(E组,N = 27)进行预处理。基L-预处理用2%利多卡因2毫升基S-预处理用0.9%生理盐水2毫升,组E-预处理麻黄碱50微克/千克体重稀释在生理盐水中至2ml生理盐水溶液中。丙泊酚30秒后注入。盲法研究人员使用一个四点的口头等级评定scale.Results病人的疼痛程度:有异丙酚诱导,三组间期间对于患者的特点和血流动力学的改变没有显著差异。有两组之间疼痛的发生率在统计学上显著差异。谁收到利多卡因预处理组患者有51.8%的疼痛。生理盐水预处理组有77.8%的疼痛。麻黄碱预处理组有疼痛高达70.4%。结论:麻黄碱用作在50微克/千克的剂量预处理既不是有用降低异丙酚注入痛也不维持更好的血流动力学。引言随着麻醉和围手术期护理病人满意度的提高质量和安全是麻醉师的首要任务之一。丙泊酚是一种通常用于麻醉诱导的静脉内(IV)镇静催眠剂;注射痛和低血压的异丙酚的两个主要不利影响。异丙酚的注射疼痛与患者满意干涉,以40-86%(1)之间发生。异丙酚属于组空间位阻酚的和注射的疼痛被认为是由血管内皮激肽释放(2)介导的。麻黄碱,提出了从血管内皮减少疼痛介质的释放(3)。有麻黄素使用预处理减少异丙酚注射疼痛具有可变结果的研究很少。这项研究是在研究的效果采取麻黄素为50μg/ kg的预处理预防异丙酚注射痛和血液动力学效果。方法采用前瞻性,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究后,机构伦理委员会批准实施。 81个同意任一性别的患者中,年龄组18-50岁,与美国麻醉医师协会Ⅰ和Ⅱ谁是择期手术需要全身麻醉中列入了研究物理状态。与过敏异丙酚史的患者,患者在服用镇静剂或止痛药,手术,神经系统或心血管疾病,肥胖,困难气道和怀孕的女性患者前24个小时被排除在study.Patients根据被分配到一个小组三通过统计软件生成随机数。由27(N = 27)各组患者,是接收该利多卡因中的一个(L组中,n = 27),生理盐水(集团S,N = 27)或麻黄碱(E组,N = 27)作为前处理。基L-预处理用2%利多卡因2毫升,组S-预处理用0.9%生理盐水2毫升,组E-预处理稀释在生理盐水中至2ml生理盐水溶液麻黄碱50微克/千克体重。预处理的所有注射器

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号