...
首页> 外文期刊>The Indian Anaesthetists Forum >Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine for preoperative anesthetic sedation in pediatric patients
【24h】

Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine for preoperative anesthetic sedation in pediatric patients

机译:鼻内咪达唑仑对儿科患者术前麻醉镇静鼻内氯胺酮的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: During induction ofanesthesiaanxiety ofchildrenmay bereduced moreeffectively by sedative medication than parental presence. Keeping in view, the necessity ofreducing preoperativeanxiety and postoperative psychological problemin pediatric patients, this studywas conducted to comparetheefficacy and safety ofintranasalmidazolamversus intranasal ketaminefor preanestheticsedation in pediatric patients. Methods: Ninety patients scheduled for thesurgery lasting between 30 min and 120 min under generalanesthesia wererandomly divided into two groups:Group Apatients received intranasalmidazolam0.2 mg/kg as premedication (5 mg/mL ampoule), whereas Group Bpatients received intranasal ketamine 5 mg/kg as premedication (50 mg/mL vial). The primary outcome measures werethecomparison of degree ofsedation of intranasalmidazolamversus intranasal ketaminefor preanestheticsedation in pediatric patients by accessing parentalseparation,acceptance of face mask, venipuncturescore,and postoperativesedation, whereas thesecondary outcome measures werethecomparison ofsideeffects. The comparison of quantitativeand qualitative variables between the groups was done using the unpaired student's“t”-testand Chi-squaretest or Fisher'sexact test, respectively. Results: The percentage of patients in the ketamine group with parentalseparation score morethan 2 was significantly higherascompared to the midazolamgroup. Acceptance offace mask, responseto venipuncture, postoperativesedation,and postoperativesideeffects werecomparable between thetwo groups. Both groups have minimalsideeffects. Conclusions: Bothmidazolamand ketamine nasally arean effective pediatric premedication for sedationwithminimalsideeffects. Parentalseparationwas better in the ketamine group ascompared to the midazolamgroup.
机译:介绍:在沉重化药物的恐慌性地嗜睡的诱导期间,通过镇静的药物感到困扰,而不是父母的存在。鉴于术前令人遗憾的是,术前术语和术后心理问题儿科患者,该研究对比较的ineTranasalmidazolamversus intanasal氯胺酮在儿科患者中进行了比较和安全。方法:九十名患者持续30分钟持续30分钟和120分钟,在通用中,术后,分为两组:基团外部剂intranasalmidazolam0.2mg / kg作为预介质(5mg / ml安瓿),而组体育酮酮酮酮/ kg作为预介质(50 mg / ml小瓶)。主要结果测量intranisalmidazolamversus intranis丙氨酸血管内核苷酸的性质,通过进入小儿患者的预检,接受面部面膜,静脉血核和术后,而结果措施WeretheComparisonsIideFefects。使用未配对的学生的“T”-Testand Chi-Scalietest或Fisher的Seckact测试,对组之间的批量定性变量进行比较。结果:氯胺酮组患者的百年母儿蛋白酶蛋白群体百年百分比对咪达唑喃群组显着高。接受遗留面具,responeTo venipuncture,术后和术后术后,在Thetwo群体之间有这些缺陷。两组都有最小的缺点。结论:Bothmidazolamand氯胺酮鼻腔治疗镇静剂的有效儿科遗传缺乏症。在氯胺酮组中更好的蛋白生物蛋白酶截止到咪达唑胺小组。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号