首页> 外文期刊>The Cryosphere Discussions >Surface melt and the importance of water flow – an analysis based on high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle?(UAV) data for an Arctic glacier
【24h】

Surface melt and the importance of water flow – an analysis based on high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle?(UAV) data for an Arctic glacier

机译:表面熔体和水流的重要性 - 基于高分辨率无人机车辆的分析?(UAV)北极冰川的数据

获取原文
           

摘要

Models of glacier surface melt are commonly used in studies of glacier mass balance and runoff; however, with limited data available, most models are validated based on ablation stakes and data from automatic weather stations?(AWSs). The technological advances of unmanned aerial vehicles?(UAVs) and structure from motion?(SfM) have made it possible to measure glacier surface melt in detail over larger portions of a glacier. In this study, we use melt measured using SfM processing of UAV imagery to assess the performance of an energy balance?(EB) and enhanced temperature index?(ETI) melt model in two dimensions. Imagery collected over a portion of the ablation zone of Fountain Glacier, Nunavut, on?21, 23, and 24?July?2016 was previously used to determine distributed surface melt. An AWS on the glacier provides some measured inputs for both models as well as an additional check on model performance. Modelled incoming solar radiation and albedo derived from UAV imagery are also used as inputs for both models, which were used to estimate melt from 21 to 24?July?2016. Both models estimate total melt at the AWS within 16% of observations (4% for ETI). Across the study area the median model error, calculated as the difference between modelled and measured melt (EB=?0.064m, ETI=?0.050m), is within the uncertainty of the measurements. The errors in both models were strongly correlated to the density of water flow features on the glacier surface. The relation between water flow and model error suggests that energy from surface water flow contributes significantly to surface melt on Fountain Glacier. Deep surface streams with highly asymmetrical banks are observed on Fountain Glacier, but the processes leading to their formation are missing in the model assessed here. The failure of the model to capture flow-induced melt would lead to significant underestimation of surface melt should the model be used to project future change.
机译:冰川表面熔体的模型通常用于冰川大量平衡和径流的研究;然而,通过有限的数据可用,大多数模型都是根据自动气象站的消融赌注和数据验证?(AWSS)。无人驾驶空中车辆的技术进步?(无人机)和来自运动的结构?(SFM)使得可以在冰川的较大部分上详细测量冰川表面熔体。在这项研究中,我们使用使用UAV图像的SFM处理测量熔体来评估能量平衡的性能吗?(EB)和增强的温度指数?(ETI)熔体模型的两个维度。图像收集在喷泉冰川的一部分消融区,努瓦特,on?21,23和24?七月?2016年以前用于确定分布式表面熔体。冰川上的AWS为两种模型提供了一些测量的输入,也为模型性能进行了额外的检查。来自UAV Imagerery的模型传入的太阳辐射和衍生的Albedo也被用作两种型号的输入,用于从21到​​24中估计熔体?7月份2016年。两种型号均在16%的观察中的AWS内估计总融化(4%的ETI)。在整个研究区域中,模型误差,计算为模型和测量熔体之间的差异(EB = 0.064M,ETI =Δ050米)在测量的不确定性范围内。两种模型中的误差与冰川表面上的水流量的密度强烈相关。水流与模型误差之间的关系表明,来自地表水流的能量显着贡献到喷泉冰川上的表面熔体。在喷泉冰川上观察到具有高度不对称银行的深表面流,但在此评估的模型中缺少导致其形成的过程。捕获流量诱导的熔体模型的失败将导致表面熔体的显着低估,如果模型用于项目未来的变化。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号