首页> 外文期刊>Urban Science >Maladaptive Planning and the Pro-Innovation Bias: Considering the Case of Automated Vehicles
【24h】

Maladaptive Planning and the Pro-Innovation Bias: Considering the Case of Automated Vehicles

机译:适用规划和专业创新偏见:考虑到自动化车辆的情况

获取原文
       

摘要

This article argues that a more critical approach to innovation policy within planning is needed and offers recommendations for achieving this. These recommendations entail rethinking the values, focus, speed, and legitimacy of innovations. It takes a critical perspective on how contemporary societies treat rapid innovation as having necessarily positive results in the achievement of objectives such as sustainability and justice. This critical perspective is needed because innovation can both contribute to and drive a form of maladaptive planning: a collective approach to reality that imposes constant and rapid changes to societal configurations due to an obsession with the new and with too little rapport with the problems in place or that it creates. A maladaptive direction for transport planning is used as a sectorial illustration of the broader conceptual ideas presented: for both sustainability and social justice reasons, it would be desirable to see peak car occurring. However, the car industry is presenting driving automation as an innovation with the potential to restore the vitality of the private vehicles market while creating effective means to dismiss alternatives to car dominance.
机译:本文认为,需要在规划内更为批判的创新政策方法,并提供建议以实现这一目标。这些建议需要重新思考创新的价值观,重点,速度和合法性。这对当代社会如何对诸如可持续性和正义等目标的迅速创新来实现快速创新,这是一项批判性观点。需要这种批判性观点,因为创新可以贡献和推动一种适应性规划的形式:由于与新的和太少的关系,对社会配置对社会配置产生了持续和快速变化的集体方法或者它创造了。运输规划的适应性方向被用作更广泛的概念思想的持部插图:对于可持续性和社会正义的原因,可能需要看到峰火发生。然而,汽车工业正在推出驾驶自动化作为一种​​创新,潜力可以恢复私人车辆市场的活力,同时创造有效的手段,以解雇汽车支配地位的替代品。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号