...
首页> 外文期刊>Poultry Science Journal >Evaluation of Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic on Performance, Immune Responses, and Gastrointestinal Health of Broiler Chickens
【24h】

Evaluation of Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Synbiotic on Performance, Immune Responses, and Gastrointestinal Health of Broiler Chickens

机译:益生菌,益生元和协会对肉鸡的性能,免疫反应和胃肠健康的评估

获取原文

摘要

To investigate the effects of newly introduced probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic, 1080 d-old broiler chickens were used in a completely randomized design with six treatments and six replicates of 30 birds each. Dietary treatments were: basal diet (control), basal diet plus 500 g of probiotic/ton (Probiotic-500), basal diet plus 500 g and 300 g of probiotic/ton during days 0-24 and 25-42 of age, respectively (Probiotic-500-300), basal diet plus 300 g of probiotic/ton (Probiotic-300), basal diet plus 1 kg of prebiotic/ton (Prebiotic), basal diet plus 1 kg of synbiotic/ton (Synbiotic). Average daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio were only affected by dietary treatments during the starter period; the lowest average daily weight gain and the highest feed conversion ratio were recorded for the control treatments compared to the others. The antibodies titers (total, IgG, and IgA) against sheep red blood cells, and Newcastle and Influenza viruses were significantly (P 0.05) increased by feeding diets containing all experimental additives compared with the control diet. The pH of the ileum decreased (P 0.05) by using probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic in the diets. The highest number of lactobacillus and E. coli populations was observed in birds fed synbiotic and control diet, respectively. The height of villus in the jejunum and its ratio to crypt depth was higher in birds fed a symbiotic diet compared to birds fed probiotic or control diets (P 0.05). Furthermore, the cecum concentration of short-chain fatty acids was greater in chickens fed diets containing probiotic, prebiotic, or synbiotic than the control chickens (P 0.05). In conclusion, although dietary supplementation with probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic had no positive effect on growth performance parameters of broiler chickens, the use of these products could exert promising effects on poultry health.
机译:为了研究新引进的益生菌,益生元,合生元和的影响,1080 d老肉鸡与6个处理和各30只,重复六次完全随机设计中使用。分别(益生菌-500),基础饲料加500克,在天0-24和25-42岁300克益生菌/吨,基础日粮(对照),基础日粮+500克益生菌/吨的:饮食处理是(益生菌-500-300),基础日粮+300克益生菌/吨(益生菌-300),基础饲料的加1公斤益生元/吨(益生素),基础饲料的加1公斤合生元/吨(共生素)的。平均每日体重增加和饲料转化率的影响只通过在起动期间饮食处理;最低平均日增重和最高饲料转化率录比别人对照处理。抗体效价(总,IgG和IgA的)抗羊红血细胞,和纽卡斯尔和流感病毒是显著(P <0.05)提高了将含有所有实验添加剂与对照饮食相比膳食。回肠的pH值通过在饮食使用益生菌,益生元,以及合生素降低(P <0.05)。在合生元供给和控制饮食,分别鸟类观察乳酸菌和大肠杆菌群体的最高数目。在空肠,其比例相对隐窝深度绒毛的高度为高于相比馈送益生菌或对照饮食鸟类(P <0.05)饲喂一种共生的饮食。此外,短链脂肪酸的盲肠浓度是更大的含鸡日粮益生菌,益生元,或合生元比对照的鸡(P <0.05)。总之,虽然在饮食中补充益生菌,益生元,合生元和对肉鸡生长性能参数没有任何积极的效果,使用这些产品可以发挥有为家禽健康的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号