首页> 外文期刊>Population health metrics >Comparison of three small-area mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio, comparative mortality figure, and life expectancy
【24h】

Comparison of three small-area mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio, comparative mortality figure, and life expectancy

机译:根据韩国城市的三个小区死亡率指标的比较:标准化死亡率,比较死亡率率和预期寿命

获取原文
       

摘要

This study aimed to compare three small-area level mortality metrics according to urbanity in Korea: the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), comparative mortality figure (CMF), and life expectancy (LE) by urbanity. We utilized the National Health Information Database to obtain annual small-area level age-specific numbers of population and deaths in Korea between 2013 and 2017. First, differences in the SMR by urbanity were examined, assuming the same age-specific mortality rates in all small areas. Second, we explored the differences in ranking obtained using the three metrics (SMR, CMF, and LE). Third, the ratio of CMF to SMR by population was analyzed according to urbanity. We found that the age-specific population distributions in urbanized areas were similar, but rural areas had a relatively old population structure. The age-specific mortality ratio also differed by urbanity. Assuming the same rate of age-specific mortality across all small areas, we found that comparable median values in all areas. However, areas with a high SMR showed a strong predominance of metropolitan areas. The ranking by SMR differed markedly from the rankings by CMF and LE, especially in areas of high mortality, while the latter two metrics did not differ notably. The ratio of CMF to SMR showed larger variations in small areas in rural areas, particularly in those with small populations, than in metropolitan and urban areas. In a comparison of multiple SMRs, bias could exist if the study areas have large differences in population structure. The use of CMF or LE should be considered for comparisons if it is possible to acquire age-specific mortality data for each small area.
机译:本研究旨在根据韩国的城市比较三个小区域层面死亡率:标准化死亡率(SMR),比较死亡率图(CMF)和寿命(CMF)与城市的预期寿命。我们利用国家卫生信息数据库在2013年和2017年期间获得韩国的年度小区域年龄级别的人口和死亡人口和死亡人口。首先,审查了城市的SMR的差异,假设所有年龄特异性的死亡率小区域。其次,我们探讨了使用三个指标(SMR,CMF和LE)获得的排名的差异。第三,根据城市分析了人口CMF对SMR的比率。我们发现,城市化地区的特定年龄人口分布相似,但农村地区的人口结构相对较大。特定年龄的死亡率也受城市的不同。假设对所有小区的特异性死亡率相同,我们发现所有领域的相当的中位数。然而,具有高度SMR的地区表现出大都市区的强烈优势。 SMR的排名显着不同于CMF和Le的排名,特别是在高死亡率的领域,而后两项度量结果没有差异。 CMF至SMR的比率在农村地区的小区展出了较大的变化,特别是在大都市和城市地区的人口中的小区。在多个SMR的比较中,如果研究领域对人口结构有很大差异,则可能存在偏差。如果可以为每个小区域获取特定年龄的死亡率数据,则应考虑使用CMF或LE的使用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号