...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant Production Science >Design and evaluation of a one-operation shallow up-cut tillage sowing method for soybean production
【24h】

Design and evaluation of a one-operation shallow up-cut tillage sowing method for soybean production

机译:一种单次浅层剪裁播种方法的设计与评价大豆生产

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Sowing using a rotary tiller rotating in reverse (up-cut) is a labor-saving technology for soybean production because it can perform tillage and sowing, make ridges, and bury winter crop residues in one operation. However, the power requirement of up-cut rotation is higher than of normal rotation (down-cut), resulting in lower working speeds. Shallow tillage sowing methods may be a solution to this problem. Here, we develop a shallow tillage sowing method using an up-cut rotary and a side-disk which could perform the aforementioned works in one operation and conducted field experiments in 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of our sowing method (up-cut shallow tillage; UST) on ridge shape, soil volumetric water content (VWC) and soybean growth and yield, compared to conventional sowing methods (up-cut conventional tillage; UCT, and down-cut conventional tillage; DCT). Ridge shape did not differ among sowing methods. The VWC at 10 and 20 cm depths in DCT was always higher than in UST and UCT, indicating poorer drainage. The VWC at 10 cm depth decreased quickly after rain in UST and UCT, indicating good surface-layer drainage, but at 20 cm depth in UCT, VWC was lower than in UST, especially during dry spells, indicating higher water-holding capacity in UST than in UCT. Shoot and root growth and seed yield did not differ among sowing methods, indicating that UST did not negatively affect soybean growth and yield. These results suggest that UST can be used for soybean production.
机译:使用旋转分蘖旋转的旋转(上切)是一种用于大豆生产的省力技术,因为它可以在一个操作中进行耕作和播种,使脊和埋头冬季作物残留物。然而,上切旋转的功率要求高于正常旋转(下切),导致更低的工作速度。浅耕作播种方法可能是对此问题的解决方案。在这里,我们开发了一种使用上切旋转和侧盘的浅耕作播种方法,该方法可以在一个操作中执行上述作品,并在2015年和2016年进行现场实验,以研究我们播种方法的效果(上切浅耕作; UST)与常规播种方法相比,脊形状,土壤体积含水量(VWC)和大豆生长和产量,与常规耕作; UCT和下切常规耕作; DCT)。山脊形状在播种方法中没有差异。 DCT中10和20cm深度的VWC总是高于UST和UCT的,表明排水较差。在UST和UCT的雨后,雨后的VWC在10厘米的深度下降,表明表面层排水良好,但在UCT中的20厘米深度,VWC低于UST,特别是在干燥的法术中,表明UST中的水持量更高比在UCT中。播种和根系生长和种子产量在播种方法中没有差异,表明UST没有对大豆生长和产量产生负面影响。这些结果表明,UST可用于大豆生产。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号