首页> 外文期刊>Pain Physician >76Review of the Safety of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Chronic Pain with Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices
【24h】

76Review of the Safety of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Chronic Pain with Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices

机译:76评价慢性疼痛与植入心律管理装置患者双极射频消融的安全性

获取原文
       

摘要

Chronic pain, especially low back pain and hip pain, has been a growing public health concern that affects over 100 million Americans annually. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has distinct advantages over other chronic pain management modalities and its use has been increasing over the past decade. Among the growing population with comorbid conduction disorders and persistent pain, RFA and its potential interference with implantable cardiac devices is of concern. RFA is becoming a foundational element of persistent pain management and has been shown to be effective in a multitude of chronic pain syndromes. Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED), such as cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators, have been used in the treatment of cardiac conduction diseases for a number of decades. With our aging population, these diseases have increased in both incidence and prevalence. Chronic pain and cardiac conduction diseases are both common in our increasingly aging population. Objectives: This study aims to determine if the literature supports the hypothesis that patients with CIEDs can safely use RFA with minimal to no interaction. Study Design: Systematic assessment of literature with a modified approach with bipolar RFA. Methods: A narrative review with systematic assessment of the literature was carried out. In this review, we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), open non-randomized control studies, prospective studies, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports. All types of radiofrequency utilized for pain management including pulsed and conventional were included. Outcome measures included interactions between the cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), adverse events, RFA efficacy in treating the pain using pain scores, and other complications. Results: Our search criteria yielded 4 studies for inclusion, with inclusion of 33 patients and 71 bipolar radiofrequency for treatments. No adverse events or interactions occurred between the bipolar radiofrequency device and the implanted cardiac devices in any of these patients. Bipolar radiofrequency was utilized in all patients (n = 33). Overall there were no complications or malfunctions. Limitations: Small sample size, narrative review. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that bipolar RFA can be safely used in patients with CIEDs for chronic pain provided that proper precautions are employed. Considerations for safe use are provided.
机译:慢性疼痛,尤其是腰痛和髋关节疼痛,一直是越来越多的公共卫生关注,每年影响超过1亿美国人。射频消融(RFA)与其他慢性疼痛管理方式不同的优势,其使用在过去十年中一直在增加。在具有合并疾病和持续疼痛的人群中,RFA及其对可植入心脏装置的潜在干扰是关注的。 RFA正在成为持续疼痛管理的基本要素,并且已被证明在众多慢性疼痛综合征中有效。心脏起搏器或可植入的心脏起搏器除颤器等心脏可植入的电子设备(CIED)已被用于治疗心脏传导疾病的几十年。随着我们的衰老人口,这些疾病的发病率和患病率增加。在我们越来越老的人口中,慢性疼痛和心脏传导疾病均常见。目的:本研究旨在确定文献是否支持CIEDS患者可以安全地使用RFA的假设,以最小的互动。研究设计:用双极RFA改进方法的文学系统评估。方法:进行了对文献系统评估的叙述审查。在本综述中,我们包括随机对照试验(RCT),公开非随机对照研究,前瞻性研究,回顾性研究,案例系列和案例报告。包括包括脉冲和常规包括脉冲和常规的疼痛管理的所有类型的射频。结果测量包括心血管植入电子设备(CIED)和射频消融(RFA)之间的相互作用,不良事件,RFA在使用疼痛评分治疗疼痛以及其他并发症中的疗效。结果:我们的搜索标准产生了4项研究,包括33名患者和71例双相射频进行治疗。在任何这些患者中,双极射频装置和植入的心脏装置之间没有发生不良事件或相互作用。在所有患者中使用双极射频(n = 33)。总体而言,没有任何并发​​症或故障。限制:小样本大小,叙述审查。结论:本研究提供了证据表明,如果采用适当的预防措施,可以安全地使用双极RFA在慢性疼痛的患者中使用。提供了安全使用的考虑因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号