...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Influence of Bioactive, Resin and Glass Ionomer luting cements on the fracture loads of dentin bonded ceramic crowns
【24h】

Influence of Bioactive, Resin and Glass Ionomer luting cements on the fracture loads of dentin bonded ceramic crowns

机译:生物活性,树脂和玻璃离聚物的影响对牙本质粘结陶瓷冠部的裂缝载荷

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To investigate the failure loads of dentin bonded all-ceramic crowns when luted with Bioactive, resin and glass ionomer cements (GIC) in an in-vitro setting. Methods: This study was conducted at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, from Nov.2018 to March 2019. In this study, 60 premolar teeth were prepared for dentin-bonded ceramic crowns. Lithium disilicate ceramic crowns fabricated using CAD-CAM technique were cemented to teeth using Bioactive (ACITVA), Resin (Nexus 3 Gen) and GIC (Ketac Cem- Maxicap). Half of the bonded specimens in each group were thermocycled (50000 cycles), however the remaining half were not aged (n=10). Fracture loads of bonded crowns were assessed by exposing them to static axial occlusal loads (1mm/min) using a round ended metal probe in a Universal testing machine. Means and standard deviations among the study groups were compared with ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test. Results: Highest failure loads were observed in resin group without ageing (thermocycling) (689.13±89.41 N), however, the lowest loads were observed in GIC specimens with ageing (243.16±49.03 N). Among non-aged samples, failure loads for Bioactive (480.30±47.26 N) group were less than Resin (689.13±89.41 N) samples but higher than GIC (307.51±45.29 N) specimens respectively. Among the aged specimens, Bioactive (404.42±60.43 N) showed significantly higher failure loads than GIC (243.16±49.03 N), however lower failure loads than Resin (582.33±95.95 N) samples. Conclusions: Dentin boned crowns with resin cementation showed higher failure loads than Bioactive and GIC luted crowns. Crowns luted with Bioactive cement showed acceptable failure loads for use as restoration on anterior teeth. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1946 How to cite this:Vohra F, Altwaim M, Alshuwaier AS, Al-Deeb M, Alfawaz Y, Alrabiah M, et al. Influence of Bioactive, Resin and Glass Ionomer luting cements on the fracture loads of dentin bonded ceramic crowns. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):---------.??doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1946 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:目的:探讨在体外设定中用生物活性,树脂和玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)在体外设置时牙本质键合全陶瓷冠的破坏载荷。方法:本研究于2018年11月20日至2019年3月,沙特阿拉伯国王沙特阿拉伯大学进行了。在本研究中,为牙本质键合的陶瓷冠进行了60种磨牙牙齿。使用CAD-CAM技术制造的锂静止陶瓷冠使用生物活性(ACITVA),树脂(Nexus 3 Gen)和GIC(Ketac CEM-Maxicap)粘附到牙齿上。每组中的一半键合标本是热循环的(50000次循环),但剩余的一半未老化(n = 10)。通过在通用试验机中使用圆形的金属探针将它们暴露于静止的轴向咬合载荷(1mm / min)来评估粘结冠的断裂载荷。将研究组中的手段和标准偏差与ANOVA和Tukey-KRamer进行比较多重比较测试。结果:在没有老化的树脂组中观察到最高的故障载荷(热循环)(689.13±89.41 n),然而,在具有老化的GIC标本中观察到最低载荷(243.16±49.03 n)。在非老子样品中,生物活性(480.30±47.26 n)组的失效载荷小于树脂(689.13±89.41 n)样品,但分别高于GIC(307.51±45.29 n)标本。在老化的标本中,生物活性(404.42±60.43n)显示出比GIC更高的失效载荷(243.16±49.03 n),但是损失低于树脂(582.33±95.95 n)样品。结论:树脂胶结的牙本质骨冠状胶囊显示出比生物活性和GIC胶冠的失效载荷更高。用生物活性水泥而胶冠显示出可接受的失效负载作为前齿的恢复。 Doi:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1946如何引用这一点:Vohra F,Altwaim,Alshuwaier As,Al-Deeb M,Alfawaz Y,Alrabiah M,等。生物活性,树脂和玻璃离聚物排放水泥对牙本质粘结陶瓷冠部骨折负荷的影响。 Pak J Med Sci。 2020; 36(3):---------。?? DOI:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1946这是一个开放的访问文章,分布在创造性下的条款下归属许可证(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0),它允许在任何介质中不受限制的使用,分发和再现,只要原始工作被正确引用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号