...
首页> 外文期刊>Pakistan journal of medical sciences. >Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors-comparison?of?off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping
【24h】

Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors-comparison?of?off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping

机译:肾脏保留肾脏肿瘤的手术 - 比较吗?Hilar夹紧的夹层部分肾切除术

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Objective: Open partial nephrectomy (PN) is still considered gold standard procedure for T1 localized renal tumors. Conventional technique involves clamping of the renal artery with or without vein however, renal ischemia produces a certain level of damage to the kidneys. This study aims to investigate potential effect of off-clamp vs. hilar clamping PN on renal function. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent unilateral, open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors b/w January 2009 December 2016 at our institution. A total of 90 partial nephrectomies were performed of which 65 cases were eligible for analysis. Non clamping technique was used in 43 while clamp was applied in 22 patients. Variables studied were patients’ demographics, clinical variables, the laterality, tumors size and location, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, blood loss, tumor histology and surgical margins. Patients’ renal function (serum creatinine and eGFR) were determined pre-operatively, at 3 and 12 months follow up. Data was analyzed on SPSS v. 22. Results: Both the groups were comparable with regards to pre-operative renal function. Mean?radiological size of tumor was 4.71±1.31 and 3.81±1.0 (0.003) in two groups respectively. Mean R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score was 6.1±1.5 in off-clamp group compared to 7.05±1.7 in clamp group (p=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in operative duration, blood loss, positive surgical margins and intra/ peri-operative complications. At three months and one year, renal function was better preserved in non-clamp group compared to clamp group (p=0.001 and 0.007 respectively). Conclusion: Off clamp open partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible option leading to less decline in renal function. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 How to cite this:Jalbani IK, Nazim SM, Ahmed M, Abbas F. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors- comparison of?off-clamp partial nephrectomy with hilar clamping. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
机译:背景和目的:打开部分肾切除术(PN)仍被认为是T1局部肾肿瘤的黄金标准程序。常规技术涉及用静脉夹紧肾动脉,然而,肾缺血产生对肾脏的一定程度的损害。本研究旨在调查越钳夹住PN对肾功能的潜在影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,对肾脏肿瘤的单侧开放的部分肾切除术,B / W于2016年12月在我们的机构进行了肾脏肿瘤。进行共有90例部分肾切除术,其中均有65例符合分析。在23例患者中施用夹具时,使用非夹紧技术。研究的变量是患者人口统计学,临床变量,横向,肿瘤大小和位置,R.E.N.A.L肾小尘评分,血液损失,肿瘤组织学和手术边缘。患者的肾功能(血清肌酐和EGFR)预先测定,在3和12个月后续进行。数据在SPSS v.22上进行了分析。结果:两组两者都与术前肾功能相当。平均值?肿瘤的放射性大小分别为两组肿瘤4.71±1.31和3.81±1.0(0.003)。平均值的re.e.n.a.1.L浊度分数在嵌夹组中为6.1±1.5,而夹具组中的7.05±1.7(p = 0.04)。在手术持续时间,血液损失,阳性手术边缘和术内/术中,没有发现统计学上显着差异。与钳位组相比,在三个月和一年内,肾功能最好在非钳位组中保存(分别为P = 0.001和0.007)。结论:关闭夹夹开放部分肾切除术是安全可行的选择,导致肾功能下降较小。 doi:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533如何引用这一点:Jalbani Ik,Nazim Sm,Ahmed M,ABBAS F.肾肾肿瘤的肾脏肿瘤的术语 - 比较 - 封闭局部肾切除术的比较亨拉夹紧。 Pak J Med Sci。 2020; 36(3):---------。 DOI:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1533这是一个开放式访问文章,根据Creative Commons归因许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)分发只要正确引用原始工作,允许在任何媒体中不受限制使用,分发和再现。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号