首页> 外文期刊>Southern Med Review >Assessment of prescription pattern and prescription error in outpatient Department at Tertiary Care District Hospital, Central Nepal
【24h】

Assessment of prescription pattern and prescription error in outpatient Department at Tertiary Care District Hospital, Central Nepal

机译:尼泊尔市第三关节区医院门诊户处处方模式和处方误差评估

获取原文
           

摘要

The rational use of medicine improves patient s quality of life. Excessive and inappropriate prescriptions result in severe consequences. The study of drug use patterns and prescription errors is necessary to promote rational drug use in developing countries. The aim of the study was to evaluate prescription practice and help to the quality use of medicine. A retrospective, cross-sectional and quantitative study was conducted at Bharatpur District Hospital in central Nepal. The outpatient prescriptions retained at the pharmacy from November to December 2017 were used to evaluate prescription patterns and errors. The total of 770 prescriptions were reviewed. The stratified random sampling method was used. The total of 2448 drugs were prescribed in 770 prescriptions or patients. The average number of drugs per encounter was 3.2. The percentage of encounter with antibiotic and injection was 37.9% (n = 292) and 0.7% (n = 5), respectively. The percentage of drugs prescribed by generic and from an essential medicine list of Nepal was 2.9% (n = 72) and 21.3% (n = 521), respectively. The most common 32.5% of prescriptions contain three drugs and 24.7% of prescriptions contain four drugs. The average prescription errors per prescription were 3.4. Among total errors, omission errors related to prescriber were 1.5 (n = 1135), omission errors related to the drug were 1.5 (n = 1189) and commission errors were 0.3 (n = 269). The total of 249 drug interactions were found in 19.1% (n = 147) prescriptions. The common prescription errors were due to failure to mention prescriber name 87.5% (n = 674), failure to mention prescriber signature 19.2% (n = 148) and failure to mention diagnosis 39.2% (n = 302). The study shows low compliance with WHO prescribing indicators and high prescription errors. The prescribing practices were not confirmed to the standard recommended by WHO. Prescribing from the Essential Drug List (EDL), low rates of generic prescribing, high antibiotic prescribing and polypharmacy were a major problem. The study found major errors in prescriber and prescribed medicine details. Remarkable drug interactions were seen in prescribed medicines. The study recommended necessary practices and policy formulation and implementation by DTC and regulatory bodies to promote the rational use of medicine.
机译:理性使用药物改善了患者的生活质量。过度和不适当的处方导致严重后果。对药物使用模式和处方误差的研究是促进发展中国家的理性药物使用所必需的。该研究的目的是评估处方实践并有助于药物的质量使用。在尼泊尔中部Bharatpur区医院进行了回顾性,横截面和定量研究。 2017年11月至2017年12月保留在药房的门诊处方用于评估处方模式和错误。审查了770名处方。使用分层随机抽样方法。在770个处方或患者中规定了2448种药物。每次遭遇的药物的平均数量为3.2。抗生素和注射率的百分比分别为37.9%(n = 292)和0.7%(n = 5)。通用和来自尼泊尔的基本药物列表规定的药物百分比分别为2.9%(n = 72)和21.3%(n = 521)。最常见的32.5%的处方含有三种药物,24.7%的处方含有四种药物。每个处方的平均处方误差为3.4。在总误差中,与前方率相关的省阳误差为1.5(n = 1135),与药物相关的省阳误差为1.5(n = 1189),委员会误差为0.3(n = 269)。 19.1%(n = 147)处方有249种药物相互作用。常见的处方错误是由于未能提前度名称87.5%(n = 674),未能提前售价19.2%(n = 148),并且未能提及诊断39.2%(n = 302)。该研究表明,遵守遵守谁规定指标和高处方错误。未定规范的规定尚未确认谁推荐的标准。从基本药物清单(EDL),低通用规定,高抗生素规定和多野营工的规定是一个主要问题。该研究发现了处方的主要错误和规定的药物细节。在规定的药物中看到了显着的药物相互作用。该研究推荐了DTC和监管机构的必要行为和政策制定和执行,以促进理性使用医学。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号