...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil and Water Research >Harmonisation of a large-scale historical database with the actual Czech soil classification system
【24h】

Harmonisation of a large-scale historical database with the actual Czech soil classification system

机译:用实际捷克土壤分类系统协调大型历史数据库

获取原文
           

摘要

The possibility of the adequate use of data and maps from historical soil surveys depends, to a large measure, on their harmonisation. Legacy data originating from a large-scale national mapping campaign, “Systematic soil survey of agricultural soils in Czechoslovakia (SSS, 1961–1971)”, were harmonised and converted according to the actual system of soil classification and descriptions used in Czechia – the Czech taxonomic soil classification system (CTSCS). Applying the methods of taxonomic distance and quantitative analysis and reclassification of the selected soil properties, the conversion of two types of mapping soil units with different detailed soil information (General soil representative (GSR), and Basic soil representative (BSR)) to their counterparts in the CTSCS has been effectuated. The results proved the good potential of the used methods for the soil data harmonisation. The closeness of the concepts of the two classifications was shown when a number of soil classes had only one counterpart with a very low taxonomic distance. On the contrary, soils with variable soil properties were approximating several related units. The additional information on the soil skeleton content, texture, depth and parent material, available for the BSR units, showed the potential in the specification of some units, though the harmonisation of the soil texture turned out to problematic due to the different categorisation of soil particles. The validation of the results in the study region showed a good overall accuracy (75% for GSR, 76.1% for BSR) for both spatial soil units, when better performance has been observed in BSR. The conversion accuracy differed significantly in the individual soil units, and ranged from almost 100% in Fluvizems to 0% in Anthropozems. The extreme cases of a complete mis-classification can be attributed to inconsistencies originating in the historical database and maps. The study showed the potential of modern quantitative methods in the legacy data harmonisation and also the necessity of a critical approach to historical databases and maps.
机译:从历史土壤调查中充分使用数据和地图的可能性取决于他们的协调。源自大规模国家绘图运动的传统数据,“捷克斯洛伐克的农业土壤系统土壤调查(SSS,1961-1971)”,根据捷克语中使用的土壤分类和描述的实际系统协调和转换 - 捷克语分类土壤分类系统(CTSCS)。应用分类学距离和定量分析和定量分析方法,对选定的土壤性质进行重新分类,将两种类型的映射土单位与不同详细的土壤信息(General Tille Depainsative(GSR)和基本土壤代表(BSR))转换为同行在CTSCS中已得到实现。结果证明了土壤数据协调的使用方法的良好潜力。当许多土壤类别只有一个具有非常低的分类距离的对应物时,显示了两个分类概念的近似。相反,具有可变土壤性质的土壤近似若干相关单元。有关土壤骨架含量,质地,深度和母材的附加信息,可用于BSR单位,在某些单位规范中显示出潜力,尽管土壤纹理的协调原因是由于土壤的不同分类而产生问题粒子。当在BSR中观察到更好的性能时,研究区域的结果验证良好的整体准确性(GSR为GSR,BSR 76.1%,BSR的76.1%)。转换精度在各个土壤单元中有显着不同,并且在百氟化的近100%的范围为乌斯洛泽姆的0%。完整的错误分类的极端情况可能归因于源自历史数据库和地图的不一致。该研究表明,遗产数据协调中的现代定量方法的潜力以及历史数据库和地图的批判方法的必要性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号