首页> 外文期刊>Science Editing >Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science
【24h】

Status of the data sharing policies of scholarly journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea and listed in both the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and the Web of Science

机译:在巴西,法国和韩国发布的学术期刊数据共享政策的现状,并在2018年的Scimago杂志和国家排名和科学网络中列出

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: The present study analyzed the current status of the data sharing policies of journals published in Brazil, France, and Korea that were listed in the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking and Web of Science Core Collection.Methods: Web of Science journals were selected from the 2018 Scimago Journal and Country Ranking. The homepages of all target journals were searched for the presence of statements on data sharing policies, including clinical trial data sharing policies, the level of the policies, and actual statements of data availability in articles.Results: Out of 565 journals from these three countries, 118 (20.9%) had an optional data sharing policy, and one had a mandatory data sharing policy. Harvard Dataverse was the repository of one journal. The number of journals that had adopted a data sharing policy was 11 (6.7%) for Brazil, 64 (27.6%) for France, and 44 (25.9%) for Korea. One journal from Brazil and 20 journals from Korea had adopted clinical trial data sharing policies in accordance with the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Statements of data sharing were found in articles from two journals.Conclusion: Journals from France and Korea adopted data sharing policies more actively than those from Brazil. However, the actual implementation of these policies through descriptions of data availability in articles remains rare. In many journals that appear to have data sharing policies, those policies may just reflect a standard description by the publisher, especially in France. Actual data sharing was not found to be frequent.
机译:目的:本研究分析了在2018年Scimago Journal and Country Resection of Country Core Collection中列出的法国,法国和韩国在韩国发表的日记表的数据共享政策的现状。方法:选择科学期刊网络从2018年的Scimago杂志和国家排名。搜查了所有目标期刊的主页,申请存在关于数据共享政策的陈述,包括临床试验数据共享政策,政策水平,以及条款中的数据可用性的实际陈述。结果:来自这三个国家的565个期刊,118(20.9%)有一个可选的数据共享政策,其中一个有一个强制性的数据共享政策。哈佛dativerse是一个杂志的存储库。已采用数据共享政策的期刊数量为巴西的11(6.7%),法国的64(27.6%),韩国的44名(25.9%)。来自巴西和20个来自韩国期刊的一个杂志通过了根据医学期刊编辑国际委员会的临床试验数据共享政策。在两个期刊的文章中发现了数据共享的陈述。结论:来自法国和韩国的期刊比来自巴西的人员更积极地通过了数据分享政策。但是,通过文章中的数据可用性描述了这些策略的实际实施仍然很少见。在许多似乎有数据共享策略的期刊中,这些策略可能只是反映出版商的标准描述,特别是在法国。找不到实际数据共享频繁。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号