...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of primary health care. >Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden
【24h】

Validation and initial results of surveys exploring perspectives on risks and solutions for diagnostic and medication errors in primary care in Sweden

机译:调查的验证和初始结果探讨瑞典初级保健诊断和药物误差风险和解决方案的视角

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To (1) validate and (2) display initial results of surveys to health care professionals and patients on the importance and mitigation of specified risks for diagnostic and medication errors. Design For validation, psychometric properties were analysed by assessment of construct validity and internal consistency by factor analysis. Non-parametric analyses were used concerning areas of risk, and top ranking of solutions were reported descriptively. Setting Primary health care in Sweden. Participants Health care professionals (HCPs); including physicians, nurses and practice managers, as well as patients who had experienced diagnostic or medication errors. Main outcome measures Psychometric properties of the surveys. Median ratings for risks and top rankings of solutions for professionals and patients. Results There were 939 respondents to the HCP survey. Construct validity resulted in a model with four dimensions: Patient-provider level; Support systems for every day clinical work; Shared information and cooperation between different caregivers; Risks in the environment. Internal consistency was acceptable with Cronbach’s α values above 0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis generally showed an acceptable fit. Initial results from the professionals showed the importance of continuity of care, a nationwide on-line medical platform and cooperation in transfer of care. The patient survey could not be validated because of low response rate. Conclusion The HCP survey showed some contradicting results regarding model fit and may be tentatively acceptable but validity needs further study. HCP survey answers indicated that relational continuity of care and a nationwide on-line medical platform are highly valued. Current awareness Health care professionals and patients are rather untapped sources of knowledge regarding patient safety in primary health care Main statements Validation is performed on a new survey capturing rating of risks and solutions. The validation of the health care professional survey is tentatively acceptable. Survey answers indicate that health care professionals’ and patients’ perspectives are complementary.
机译:目的达到(1)验证和(2)显示对医疗保健专业人士和患者的初步结果对诊断和药物错误的重要性和减轻特定风险的重要性和减轻。验证设计,通过评估构建有效性和因子分析来分析心理测量性能。有关风险区域的非参数分析,描述了解决方案的最高排名。在瑞典设定初级医疗保健。参与者医疗保健专业人士(HCP);包括医生,护士和实践经理,以及经历诊断或药物错误的患者。主要结果测量调查的心理学属性。中位数评级为专业人士和患者解决方案的风险和最高排名。结果HCP调查有939名受访者。构建有效性导致模型有四个维度:患者提供者级别;每天临床工作的支持系统;不同护理人员之间的共享信息与合作;环境中的风险。内部一致性可以接受克朗巴赫的α值超过0.7。确认因子分析通常表现出可接受的合适。专业人士的初步结果表明关心连续性的重要性,全国范围内的在线医疗平台和转让转移的合作。由于低响应率,无法验证患者调查。结论HCP调查显示有关模型适合的矛盾结果,可能是暂时可接受的,但有效性需要进一步研究。 HCP调查答案表明,关心的关系和全国在线医疗平台的关系高度重视。目前的意识医疗保健专业人士和患者是初级医疗保健患者安全的尚未开发的知识来源,主要陈述验证是关于捕获风险和解决方案的新调查的验证。暂时可接受医疗保健专业调查的验证。调查答案表明医疗保健专业人士“和患者的观点是互补的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号