...
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Comparing Bone-Tendon Autograft With Bone-Tendon-Bone Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Cohort Analysis
【24h】

Comparing Bone-Tendon Autograft With Bone-Tendon-Bone Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Cohort Analysis

机译:将骨肌腱自体移植与骨肌腱 - 骨自体移植进行比较ACL重建:匹配队列分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) using bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft is associated with increased postoperative anterior knee pain and pain with kneeling and has the risk of intra- and postoperative patellar fracture. Additionally, graft-tunnel mismatch is problematic, often leading to inadequate osseous fixation. Given the disadvantages of BTB, an alternative is a bone-tendon autograft (BTA) procedure that has been developed at our institution. BTA is a patellar tendon autograft with the single bone plug taken from the tibia. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of BTA ACLR. We hypothesized that this procedure will provide noninferior failure rates and clinical outcomes when compared with a BTB autograft, as well as a lower incidence of anterior knee pain, pain with kneeling, and patellar fracture. Methods: A consecutive series of 52 patients treated with BTA ACLR were retrospectively identified and compared with 50 age-matched patients who underwent BTB ACLR. The primary outcome was ACL graft failure, while secondary outcomes included subjective instability, anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and functional outcome scores (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form). Results: At a mean follow-up of 29.3 months after surgery, there were 2 reruptures in the BTA cohort (4.0%) and 2 in the BTB cohort (4.0%). In the BTA group, 18% of patients reported anterior knee pain versus 36% of the BTB group ( P = .04). A total of 22% of patients noted pain or pressure with kneeling in the BTA cohort, as opposed to 48% in the BTB cohort ( P = .006). There were no differences in functional scores. In the BTA group, 94.2% of patients reported that their knees subjectively felt stable, as compared with 86% in the BTB group ( P = .18). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the BTA ACLR leads to similarly low rates of ACL graft failure requiring revision surgery, with significantly decreased anterior knee pain and kneeling pain when compared with a BTB. Additionally, the potential complications of graft-tunnel mismatch and patellar fracture are eliminated with the BTA ACLR technique.
机译:背景:使用骨肌腱 - 骨(BTB)自体移植的前十字韧带(ACL)重建(ACLR)与术后术后膝关节疼痛和痛苦的疼痛有关,并且具有术后髌骨和术后髌骨骨折的风险。此外,移植隧道不匹配是有问题的,通常导致骨质固定不足。鉴于BTB的缺点,替代方案是在我们的机构开发的骨骼自体移植(BTA)程序。 BTA是一种髌骨肌腱,具有从胫骨中取出的单个骨插头。目的/假设:本研究的目的是评估BTA ACLR的短期结果。我们假设与BTB自体移植相比,该程序将提供不可衰竭率和临床结果,以及膝关节疼痛的较低发病率,跪下疼痛和髌骨骨折。方法:回顾性鉴定了用BTA ACLR治疗的连续系列52名患者,并与50名达到BTB ACLR的患者进行比较。主要结果是ACL接枝衰竭,而二次结果包括主观不稳定,前膝部疼痛,跪疼痛和功能结果评分(单一评估数字评估,Lysholm和国际膝关节委员会主体膝关节委员会)。结果:手术后29.3个月的平均随访,BTA队列(4.0%)和BTB队列(4.0%)中有2个角落。在BTA组中,18%的患者报告前膝疼痛与BTB组的36%(P = .04)。总共22%的患者注意到跪在BTA队列中的疼痛或压力,而不是BTB队列中的48%(P = .006)。功能分数没有差异。在BTA组中,94.2%的患者报告称,它们的膝盖主观感觉稳定,而BTB组中的86%(P = .18)。结论:本研究表明,BTA ACLR导致需要修复手术的ACL移植衰竭的同样低,与BTB相比,前膝疼痛和跪着疼痛显着降低。另外,通过BTA ACLR技术消除了移植隧道失配和髌骨骨折的潜在并发症。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号