首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Meta-analysis
【24h】

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Meta-analysis

机译:体外冲击波治疗阿基里斯患者的疗效:META分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Achilles tendinopathy is a frequent sports injury, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been proposed as a treatment. Purpose: To compare outcomes between ESWT and other nonsurgical intervention (including sham shock wave therapy) in Achilles tendinopathy patients. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We included 5 randomized controlled trials and 3 case-control studies published between 2005 and 2018. We analyzed pain scores and other outcomes that were reported in more than 3 of the 8 studies. Results: ESWT was associated with significantly better scores than comparison therapy on the visual analog scale for pain ( P & .01), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scale ( P = .01), Likert scale for satisfaction ( P = .03), Roles and Maudsley scale ( P & .01), Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment–Achilles questionnaire ( P & .01), and numerical rating scale ( P = .02). The 2 patient groups did not differ significantly in tenderness ( P = .34) or pain threshold ( P = .24). Subgroup analysis showed that ESWT led to better VAS pain scores than comparison treatments at both low-energy level (0.06-0.11 mJ/mm ~(2)) and medium-energy level (0.12-0.25 mJ/mm ~(2)) and at both shorter (&6 months) and longer (≥6 months) follow-up. Conclusion: ESWT improves pain and functional outcomes in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Further research is needed to determine the optimal energy level.
机译:背景:Achilles肌腱病是一种频繁的运动损伤,并提出了体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)作为治疗。目的:将ESWT和其他非诊断干预(包括假冲击波治疗)之间的结果进行比较,在Achilles患者中。研究设计:系统评价;证据水平,2.方法:我们在2005年至2018年间公布了5项随机对照试验和3项案例对照研究。我们分析了8项研究中有3个以上3种以上报告的疼痛评分和其他结果。结果:ESWT与对比较疗法的比较治疗有关的疼痛(P <.01),美国矫形脚和踝关节(P = .01),李克特量表满意度(P = .03 ),角色和Maudsley规模(P& .01),维多利亚体育学院评估 - 阿基尔调查问卷(P <.01)和数值额定量表(P = .02)。 2例患者组在柔软(P = .34)或疼痛阈值下没有显着差异(P = .24)。亚组分析表明,ESWT导致比较低能量水平(0.06-0.11 MJ / mm〜(2))和中能级(0.12-0.25mm / mm〜(2))的比较处理更好的VAS疼痛评分。在短时间内(& 6个月)和更长的(≥6个月)随访。结论:ESWT改善了患者患者患者的疼痛和功能性结果。需要进一步研究来确定最佳能量水平。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号