首页> 外文期刊>Open access Emergency Medicine >Attitudes Towards Introduction of Multiple Modalities of Simulation in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of Emergency Medicine (EM) Final Board Examination: A Cross-Sectional Study
【24h】

Attitudes Towards Introduction of Multiple Modalities of Simulation in Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) of Emergency Medicine (EM) Final Board Examination: A Cross-Sectional Study

机译:致力于引入急诊医学(EM)最终委员会检查的客观结构临床检查(欧安组织)的多种模拟方式:横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose:Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is the current modality of choice for evaluating practical skills for graduating emergency medicine residents of final Saudi board examination. This study aims to evaluate the attitudes of both residents and faculty towards the idea of utilizing multiple modalities of simulation in a high-stakes emergency medicine (EM) examination. The goal is to propose a method to improve the process of this examination.Participants and Methods:The data were obtained using a cross-sectional survey questionnaire that was distributed to 141 participants, including both EM residents and instructors in the Saudi Board of Emergency Medicine. An online survey tool was used. The data were collected and subsequently analyzed to gauge the general and specific attitudes of both residents and instructors.Results:Of the 141 participants, 136 provided complete responses; almost half were residents from all years, and the other half were primarily instructors (registrars, senior registrars, or consultants). Most of the participants from both groups (70% of the residents and 86% of the instructors) would like to see simulation incorporated into the final EM board OSCEs. Most of the participants (78%), however, had no experience with using multiple modalities of simulation in OSCEs. Overall, the majority (74.82%) expressed the belief that simulation-based OSCEs would improve the assessment of EM residents' competencies. The modalities that received the most support were part-task trainers and hybrid simulation (70.71% and 70%, respectively).Conclusion:From this study, we can conclude that both parties (residents and instructors) are largely willing to see multimodality simulation being incorporated into the final board examinations. Stakeholders should interpret this consensus as an impetus to proceed with such an implementation of multimodality simulation. Input from both groups should be considered when planning for such a change in this high-stakes exam.? 2020 Alsulimani et al.
机译:目的:客观结构化临床检查(欧安组织)是目前评估毕业急诊医学居民的实际技能的首选模式。本研究旨在评估居民和教师对利用高赌注急诊药物(EM)检查中的多种模拟方式的态度的态度。目标是提出一种改进该检查过程的方法。Particants和方法:使用分配给141名参与者的横断面调查问卷获得数据,包括沙特委员会的EM居民和教官。使用了在线调查工具。收集数据并随后分析,衡量居民和教师的一般和具体态度。结果:141名参与者,136个提供完整的答复;几乎一半的居民来自全年,其他一半主要是教师(注册商,高级注册商或顾问)。两组的大多数参与者(70%的居民和86%的教师)希望看到拟合到最终EM板OSCes的模拟。然而,大多数参与者(78%)在欧洲武器中使用多种模拟模式没有经验。总体而言,大多数人(74.82%)表示信念,即基于模拟的欧瓦塞将改善EM居民能力的评估。获得最多支持的方式是部分任务培训师和混合模拟(分别为70.71%和70%)。结论:从本研究中,我们可以得出结论,双方(居民和教师)在很大程度上愿意看到多模态模拟存在纳入决赛委员会的考试。利益攸关方应将这一共识作为推动,以便继续进行此类实施多模态模拟。在规划此高赌注考试时,应考虑两组的输入。 2020 alsulimani等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号