首页> 外文期刊>Open Forum Infectious Diseases >Impact of Mandatory Infectious Diseases Consultation and Real-time Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist Intervention on Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Bundle Adherence
【24h】

Impact of Mandatory Infectious Diseases Consultation and Real-time Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist Intervention on Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Bundle Adherence

机译:强制性传染病的影响咨询和实时抗微生物管理药剂干预葡萄球菌菌丝束依从性

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of infectious diseases consultation (IDC) and a real-time antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) review on the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).MethodsThis retrospective study included adult inpatients with SAB from January 2016 to December 2018 at 7 hospitals. Outcomes were compared between 3 time periods: before mandatory IDC and AMS review (period 1), after mandatory IDC and before AMS review (period 2), and after mandatory IDC and AMS review (period 3). The primary outcome was bundle adherence, defined as appropriate intravenous antimicrobial therapy, appropriate duration of therapy, appropriate surveillance cultures, echocardiography, and removal of indwelling intravenous catheters, if applicable. Secondary end points included individual bundle components, source control, length of stay (LOS), 30-day bacteremia-related readmission, and in-hospital all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 579 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. Complete bundle adherence was 65% in period 1 (n?=?241/371), 54% in period 2 (n?=?47/87), and 76% in period 3 (n?=?92/121). Relative to period 3, bundle adherence was significantly lower in period 1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.93; P?=?.02) and period 2 (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20–0.67; P?=?.0009). No difference in bundle adherence was noted between periods 1 and 2. Significant differences were seen in obtaining echocardiography (91% vs 83% vs 100%; P??.001), source control (34% vs 45% vs 45%; P?=?.04), and hospital LOS (10.5 vs 8.9 vs 12.0 days; P?=?.01). No differences were noted for readmission or mortality.ConclusionsThe addition of AMS pharmacist review to mandatory IDC was associated with significantly improved quality care bundle adherence.
机译:背景技术本研究的目的是评估传染病咨询(IDC)的影响和实时抗菌管道(AMS)关于金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)的管理审查.Methodsthis回顾性研究包括从2016年1月的成人住院患者到2018年12月在7家医院。结果在3次期间之间进行了比较:在强制性IDC和AMS审查(第1期)之前,在强制性IDC和AMS审查之前(第2期),并在强制性IDC和AMS审查之后(第3期)。主要结果是束粘附,定义为适当的静脉内抗微生物治疗,适当的治疗持续时间,适当的监测培养,超声心动图以及除留置静脉内导管,如果适用。辅助端点包括单独的束组分,源控制,住院时间长度(LOS),30天的菌血症相关的阅迟,以及医院内所有的死亡率。患者总共579名患者符合分析标准。完全束粘附在1期(N?= 241/371)期间为65%,在2时期54%(n?= 47/87),76%在3时(n?= 92/121)。相对于3期,期间,第1期束粘附显着降低(差距[或],0.58; 95%置信区间[CI],0.37-0.93; P?=β.02)和时期(或0.37; 95 %ci,0.20-0.67; p?= 0009)。在第1期和2之间没有注意到束粘附的差异。在获得超声心动图中可以看到显着差异(91%Vs 83%Vs 100%; p?<= 001),源对照(34%与45%Vs 45%; p?= ?. 04)和医院LOS(10.5 VS 8.9 VS 12.0天; P?= 01)。入院或死亡率没有差异.Clusionsthe向强制性IDC添加AMS药剂师审查与明显改善的质量护理束依从性有关。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号