首页> 外文期刊>Open Forum Infectious Diseases >Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir With Boosted Darunavir in Virologically Suppressed Adults With HIV-1: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3, Noninferiority Trial: The DUALIS Study
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir With Boosted Darunavir in Virologically Suppressed Adults With HIV-1: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 3, Noninferiority Trial: The DUALIS Study

机译:在病毒学抑制的成年人中转向Dolututgravir的疗效和安全性与HIV-1的病毒学抑制剂:随机,开放标签,多中心,第3阶段,非流动性试验:双重研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundDolutegravir (DTG) and boosted darunavir (bDRV) are potent antiretrovirals with a high resistance barrier and might be valuable switch options for people with HIV (PWH).MethodsDUALIS, a randomized, open-label, phase 3b, noninferiority clinical trial, compared the switch to DTG?+?bDRV (2DR) with continuation of 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (2NRTI)?+?bDRV (3DR). PWH with HIV RNA?50 copies/mL taking 2NRTI?+?bDRV (3DR) for?≥24 weeks (1 accepted blip?200 copies/mL) were randomized to either switch to DTG 50 mg?+?DRV 800 mg (boosted with 100 mg of ritonavir) or continue taking 3DR. The primary end point (PE) was the proportion of HIV RNA?50 copies/mL at week (W) 48. Change in NRTI backbone was not classified as failure. The estimated sample size for PE analysis was 292; the noninferiority margin was?≤–10.0%.ResultsIn total, 263 subjects were randomized and treated (2DR n?=?131, 3DR n?=?132; 90.1% male; 89.7% Caucasian; median age [interquartile range], 48 [39–54] years). At W48, 86.3% (n?=?113/131) of the 2DR subject and 87.9% (n?=?116/132) of the 3DR subjects had HIV RNA?50 copies/mL; the difference between arms was –1.6% (95.48% CI, based on the adjusted alpha level accounting for the interim analysis at W24, –9.9% to +6.7%; discontinuations due to adverse events: 2DR, 4.6% [n?=?6]; 3DR, 0.8% [n?=?1]). Kaplan-Meier estimates of confirmed HIV RNA?≥50 copies/mL at W48 were 1.6% (n?=?2) in the 2DR and 3.1% (n?=?4) in the 3DR group. Development of treatment-emergent resistance was not observed.ConclusionsSwitching to DTG?+?bDRV was noninferior to continuing 3DR in subjects already treated with bDRV.
机译:BackgroundDolutgravir(DTG)和增强的Darunavir(BDRV)是有效的抗逆转录病毒,具有高抗抵抗力障碍,可能是HIV(PWH)的人的有价值的开关选择.Methodsdualis,一种随机的开放标签,第3B级,非流动性临床试验,比较切换到DTG?+?BDRV(2DR),延续2核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(2NRTI)?+?BDRV(3dr)。用HIV RNA的PWHα<50拷贝/ ml,服用2nRTI?BDRV(3dr)(3dr)(1℃,1个被接受的填充物/ mL)被随机转换为DTG 50mg?+ΔDRV800mg (用100毫克Ritonavir提升)或继续服用3dr。主要终点(PE)是HIV RNAα<50份/ mL的比例,每周(w)48. NRTI骨架的变化未被归类为失败。 PE分析的估计样本量为292;非事实体边缘是≤-10.0%。≤10%。培养物总共,263个受试者被随机处理和处理(2dr n?=Δ131,3drn?=?132; 90.1%雄性; 89.7%的高加索人;中位年龄[四分位数],48 [39-54]年)。在W48,2DR主题的86.3%(n?=α11131)和3dr受试者的87.9%(n?= 116/132)的HIV RNA?<50拷贝/ mL;武器之间的差异为-1.6%(95.48%CI,基于调整后的α水平算用于W24的中期分析,-9.9%至+ 6.7%;由于不良事件导致的停止:2DR,4.6%[n?=? 6d] 3dr,0.8%[n吗?=?1])。 Kaplan-Meier在W48的确认的HIV RNAα≥50拷贝/ ml的估计为3DR组中的2DR和3.1%(n?= 3.4)。未观察到治疗的抗性的发展。与DTGα+ +Δbdrv在已经用BDRV治疗的受试者中继续3dr,+Δbdrv。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号