In 1869 Rudolf Virchow, the distinguished Prussian pathologist who pioneered the modern concept of cellular pathology, was offered an honorary Fellowship of The Royal Society of Edinburgh (RSE). However, the Rev. Joseph T Goodsir, Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (FRSE), the brother of Professor John Goodsir FRSE, the famed Edinburgh anatomist who had died two years previously, mounted a campaign to stop the award. As part of this he published a pamphlet entitled Grounds of Objection to the Admission of Professor Virchow as an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. The disagreement centred on John Goodsir's pioneering research and writings on cell theory. These had in fact been recognised by Virchow, who dedicated the English language edition of his most famous publication Cellular Pathology to John Goodsir. Joseph Goodsir was not, however, satisfied by this and the basis of his objection was that Virchow had plagiarised from his brother. We describe the background and outcome of this dispute.
展开▼
机译：在1869年，Rudolf Virchow是杰出的普鲁士病理学家，他们开创了蜂窝病理学现代概念，提供了爱丁堡皇家学会的荣誉奖学金（RSE）。然而，Rev.Joseph T Macurir，爱丁堡皇家学会（Frse），兄弟兄弟John Macure of John MaSir Frse，这是两年前死于两年的着名的爱丁堡解剖学家，登上了一个停止奖项的运动。作为这一的一部分，他发表了一份题为异议的小册子，以获得Virchow教授作为爱丁堡皇家学会的荣誉研究员。以约翰商机在细胞理论上的开创性研究和作品为中心的分歧。这些实际上已经被Virchow认识到了Virchow，他们将他最着名的出版物蜂窝病理学的英语版本致力于John Gobsir。然而，约瑟夫商品并非满足，他反对的基础是Virchow从他的兄弟抄袭。我们描述了这一纠纷的背景和结果。
展开▼
