首页> 外文期刊>Risk Management and Healthcare Policy >Patient Safety Culture in Handling Prescriptions and Interprofessional Collaboration Practices Amongst Community Pharmacists: An Investigative Simulated Patient Study from the United Arab Emirates
【24h】

Patient Safety Culture in Handling Prescriptions and Interprofessional Collaboration Practices Amongst Community Pharmacists: An Investigative Simulated Patient Study from the United Arab Emirates

机译:患者安全文化在处理处方和讲座的社区药剂师之间的辩论协作实践:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的调查模拟患者研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background:Community pharmacists are in a unique position to identify drug therapy-related problems (DTRPs) in prescriptions and mitigate them by communicating with prescriber. This study assessed the ability of community pharmacists (CPs) to identify DTRPs in prescriptions, the level of interprofessional collaboration among physician and CPs in mitigating the identified DTRPs, and the existing safety culture practices among CPs.Methods:Trained simulated patients (SPs), five final-year BSc Pharm female students, visited conveniently selected community pharmacies (n = 50) in Ajman emirate of the United Arab Emirates, with dummy prescriptions containing DTRPs (total 50 prescriptions with five different types of DTRPs categorized per the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Version 8) and assessed the DTRP-identifying ability of the CPs. SPs also observed the steps taken by the CPs to mitigate identified DTRPs and existing (if any) collaborative practices between CPs and physician. SPs documented their observations in a checklist immediately after leaving the pharmacy premises, which served as the data source. Statistical analyses were performed with chi-square at alpha = 0.05.Results:Of the 50 respondents, 44% (n = 22) were able to identify the DTRPs. DTRP identification by pharmacists was associated with labeling [chi-square = 7.879, p value = 0.019], reconciliation [chi-square = 10.359, p value = 0.001], counseling standard [chi-square = 19.09, p = 0.000] and physician visit suggestion [chi-square = 31.15, p = 0.000]. The labeling standards for prescriptions with DTRPs were "low" in five (50%), "average" in three (30%) and "good" in two (20%) of the cases with wrong dose. Average counseling time of the CPs was 80.38 ± 71.61 seconds. The counseling standard had no significant association with counseling time [chi-square = 34.79, p = 0.250] and use of drug information sources [chi-square = 2.86, p = 0.243]. Average time spent in dispensing is 74.4 ± 73.05 seconds. None (n = 0) of the CPs communicated with the physician, and only five out of 50 (10%) of CPs checked any DI sources. However, in 19 (38%) cases, the CPs recommended the SPs to consult their physician prior to taking the medications.Conclusion:CPs were generally able to identify DTRPs and mitigate DTRPs by recommending physician consultation. Nevertheless, there were no professional collaborations between the SPs and physicians. The dispensing and counseling standards were not appreciable.? 2020 Palaian et al.
机译:背景:社区药剂师处于独特的位置,以识别处方药中的药物治疗相关问题(DTRPS),并通过与前方互信进行减轻它们。本研究评估了社区药剂师(CPS)在处方识别DTRP的能力,医生和CPS在减轻所确定的DTRP中的争论协作水平,以及CPS的现有安全文化实践。培训的模拟患者(SPS),五个最后一年的BSC Pharm女学生,在阿拉伯联合酋长国阿伯曼酋长国的方便选出的社区药房(N = 50),含有DTRP的虚拟处方(总共5种不同类型的DTRPS,每种药物护理网络分类为50种规定的DTRPS版本8)并评估CPS的DTRP识别能力。 SPS还观察到CPS采取的步骤减轻了CPS和医生之间的确定的DTRP和现有的(如果有)协作实践。在离开药房处所后,SPS在核对清单中记录了他们的观察,这是作为数据源的药房。在α= 0.05的Chi-Square进行统计分析。结果:50名受访者,44%(n = 22)能够识别DTRPS。药剂师的DTRP识别与标签相关[Chi-Square = 7.879,P值= 0.019],咨询标准[Chi-square = 10.359,P值= 0.001],咨询标准[Chi-Square = 19.09,P = 0.000]和医生访问建议[Chi-Square = 31.15,p = 0.000]。 DTRP的处方标签标准在五(50%),“平均值”中为“低”,在三(30%)和“良好”中,两(20%)的病例有错误剂量。 CPS的平均咨询时间为80.38±71.61秒。咨询标准与咨询时间没有显着关联[Chi-Square = 34.79,P = 0.250]以及使用药物信息来源[Chi-Square = 2.86,P = 0.243]。分配的平均时间为74.4±73.05秒。与医生沟通的CPS无(n = 0),只有50个(10%)的CPS中的五个(10%)检查了任何DI源。但是,在19(38%)案件中,CPS推荐SPS在服用药物之前咨询他们的医生。结论:CPS通常能够通过推荐医生咨询来确定DTRP并减轻DTRPS。尽管如此,SPS和医生之间没有专业的合作。分配和咨询标准不可明显。 2020 Palaian等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号