首页> 外文期刊>Revista Espaola de Enfermedades Digestivas >Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis
【24h】

Meta-analysis of the association between appendiceal orifice inflammation and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis

机译:阑尾孔口炎症和阑尾切除术和溃疡性结肠炎关联的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between appendiceal orifice inflammation (AOI) and appendectomy and ulcerative colitis (UC) by a meta-analysis. Methods: Databases were thoroughly searched for studies on AOI and UC up to January 2016. Three comparisons were performed: a) whether the previous appendectomy was a risk factor of UC; b) influence of appendectomy on UC courses; c) influence of AOI on UC severity. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were the effects sizes. The merging of results and publication bias assessment were performed by using RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using Stata 12.0. Results: Nineteen studies were selected in the present study. Results of comparison I showed that appendectomy was a protective factor of UC (OR = 0.44; 95% CI [0.30, 0.64]). Comparison II indicated appendectomy had no significant influence in the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.74, 1.42]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.73, 1.39]; pancolitis: OR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.59, 1.43]; colectomy: OR = 1.38, 95% CI [0.62, 3.04]). Comparison III indicated UC combined with AOI did not affect the courses of UC (proctitis: OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.67, 1.98]; left-sided colitis: OR = 1.14, 95% CI [0.24, 5.42]; colectomy: OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.10, 1.23]). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of the results in the present study. Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicated appendectomy can reduce the risk of UC. But appendectomy or AOI had no influence on the severity of the disease and the effect of surgical treatment.
机译:目的:本研究旨在通过META分析研究阑尾孔口炎症(AOI)和溃疡性和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)之间的关系。方法:对2016年1月的AOI和UC进行彻底搜索数据库。进行了三种比较:a)先前的阑尾切除术是UC的危险因素; b)阑尾切除对UC课程的影响; c)AOI对UC严重程度的影响。差异比率(或)和95%的置信区间(CIS)是效果大小。使用Revman 5.3进行结果和出版物偏见评估的合并。使用Stata 12.0进行敏感性分析。结果:本研究选择了19项研究。比较结果表明,阑尾切除术是UC的保护因子(或= 0.44; 95%CI [0.30,0.64])。比较II表明阑尾切除术在UC的疗程中没有显着影响(预科炎:或= 1.03,95%CI [0.74,1.42];左侧结肠炎:或= 1.01,95%CI [0.73,1.39];致丧失is或= 0.92,95%CI [0.59,1.43];结肠切除术:或= 1.38,95%CI [0.62,3.04])。比较III指示的UC与AOI结合不影响UC的疗程(预科炎:或= 1.15,95%CI [0.67,1.98];左侧结肠炎:或= 1.14,95%CI [0.24,5.42];联合胶质术:或= 0.36,95%CI [0.10,1.23])。敏感性分析证实了本研究中的结果的稳健。结论:总之,该荟萃分析表明阑尾切除术可以降低UC的风险。但阑尾切除术或AOI对疾病的严重程度和手术治疗的影响没有影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号