...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory Research >Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
【24h】

Comparisons of exacerbations and mortality among LAMA/LABA combinations in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

机译:达玛/拉巴组合在稳定的慢性阻塞性肺病中的加剧和死亡率的比较:系统评价与贝叶网络荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background Only few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for head-to-head comparison have been conducted between various combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs). Our study was conducted to compare acute exacerbation and all-cause mortality among different LAMA/LABA regimens using Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library (search date: July 1, 2019). We included parallel-group RCTs comparing LAMA/LABA combinations with other inhaled drugs in the stable COPD for?≥?48?weeks. Two different network geometries were used. The geometry of network (A) had nodes of individual drugs or their combination, while that of network (B) combined all other treatments except LAMA/LABA into each drug class. This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO; CRD42019126753. Results We included 16 RCTs involving a total of 39,065 patients with stable COPD. Six combinations of LAMA/LABA were identified: tiotropium/salmeterol, glycopyrrolate/indacaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol, tiotropium/olodaterol, aclidinium/formoterol, and glycopyrrolate/formoterol. We found that umeclidinium/vilanterol was associated with a lower risk of total exacerbations than other LAMA/LABAs in the NMA using network (A) (level of evidence: low or moderate). However, the significant differences were not present in the NMA of network (B). There were no significant differences among the LAMA/LABA combinations in terms of the number of moderate to severe exacerbations, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, or pneumonia. Conclusions The present NMA including all available RCTs provided that there is no strong evidence suggesting different benefits among LAMA/LABAs in patients with stable COPD who have been followed up for 48?weeks or more. Trial registration : This study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO; CRD42019126753.
机译:抽象背景只有很少的随机对照试验(RCT)用于头部到头比较的各种组合在长效的毒蕈碱拮抗剂(Lamas)和长效β-激动剂(Labas)之间进行。我们的研究进行了使用贝叶斯网络Meta分析(NMA)的不同喇嘛/拉巴方案之​​间的急性加剧和全因死亡率。方法搜索Medline,Embase和Cochrane图书馆(搜索日期:2019年7月1日)。我们包括平行组RCT,将Lama / Laba组合与其他吸入药物的稳定COPD中的其他吸入药物进行比较?≥?48?周。使用了两个不同的网络几何形状。网络的几何形状(a)具有个别药物的节点或它们的组合,而网络(b)将所有其他治疗组合在于每个药物课程。本研究在Prospero期间潜在注册; CRD42019126753。结果我们包括16名RCT,涉及共39,065名稳定COPD患者。鉴定了六喇嘛/拉巴的六种组合:噻托溴铵/萨尔梅洛特,甘油吡咯醇/茚替醇,UMECLIDINIUM / VILANTEROL,TIOTROPIUM / OLODATEROL,ACLIDINIUM / FOMOTEROL和甘油吡咯烷/甲酚。我们发现,UMECLIDINIUM / VILANTEROL与NMA中的其他LAMA / LAMAS使用网络(A)(证据水平:低或中等)的风险相关。然而,网络的NMA(B)中不存在显着差异。喇嘛/ Laba组合在中度至严重恶化的数量,全因死亡率,主要不良心血管事件或肺炎方面没有显着差异。结论目前的NMA包括所有可用的RCT,规定没有强有力的证据表明达玛/拉斯患者在稳定的COPD患者中有不同的益处,他们已经进行了48个?周或更长时间。审判登记:本研究在Prospero期间潜在注册; CRD42019126753。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号