...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory Research >Physiologically variable ventilation reduces regional lung inflammation in a pediatric model of acute respiratory distress syndrome
【24h】

Physiologically variable ventilation reduces regional lung inflammation in a pediatric model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

机译:生理上可变通风在急性呼吸窘迫综合征的儿科模型中减少了区域肺炎

获取原文

摘要

Abstract Background Benefits of variable mechanical ventilation based on the physiological breathing pattern have been observed both in healthy and injured lungs. These benefits have not been characterized in pediatric models and the effect of this ventilation mode on regional distribution of lung inflammation also remains controversial. Here, we compare structural, molecular and functional outcomes reflecting regional inflammation between PVV and conventional pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) in a pediatric model of healthy lungs and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods New-Zealand White rabbit pups (n?=?36, 670?±?20?g [half-width 95% confidence interval]), with healthy lungs or after induction of ARDS, were randomized to five hours of mechanical ventilation with PCV or PVV. Regional lung aeration, inflammation and perfusion were assessed using x-ray computed tomography, positron-emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography, respectively. Ventilation parameters, blood gases and respiratory tissue elastance were recorded hourly. Results Mechanical ventilation worsened respiratory elastance in healthy and ARDS animals ventilated with PCV (11?±?8%, 6?±?3%, p??0.04), however, this trend was improved by PVV (1?±?4%, ??6?±?2%). Animals receiving PVV presented reduced inflammation as assessed by lung normalized [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in healthy (1.49?±?0.62 standardized uptake value, SUV) and ARDS animals (1.86?±?0.47 SUV) compared to PCV (2.33?±?0.775 and 2.28?±?0.3 SUV, respectively, p??0.05), particularly in the well and poorly aerated lung zones. No benefit of PVV could be detected on regional blood perfusion or blood gas parameters. Conclusions Variable ventilation based on a physiological respiratory pattern, compared to conventional pressure-controlled ventilation, reduced global and regional inflammation in both healthy and injured lungs of juvenile rabbits.
机译:摘要在健康和受伤的肺部,已经观察到基于生理呼吸模式的可变机械通风的背景益处。这些益处尚未在儿科模型中表征,这种通风模式对肺炎区域分布的影响也存在争议。在这里,我们比较了在健康肺和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的小儿模型中反映了反映PVV和常规压力控制通气(PCV)之间的区域炎症的结构,分子和功能结果。方法采用新西兰白兔幼崽(n?= 36,670?±20?g [半宽95%置信区间]),具有健康的肺或诱导ARDS后,随机化为5小时的机械通气PCV或PVV。使用X射线计算机断层扫描,正电子排放断层扫描和单光子发射计算机断层扫描评估区域肺曝气,炎症和灌注。每小时记录通风参数,血气和呼吸组织弹性。结果机械通风在用PCV通风的健康和ARDS动物中呼吸弹性恶化(11?±8%,6?±3%,P?<0.04),PVV改善了这种趋势(1?±4 %,?? 6?±2%)。接受PVV的动物呈现出降低的炎症,如肺标准化的评估[18 f]氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取,与PCV相比0.775和2.28?±0.3 suv,分别p?<0.05),特别是在井和肺区充气不良。可以在区域血液灌注或血气参数上检测PVV的任何好处。结论基于生理呼吸模式的可变通风,与常规的压力控制通气,减少少年兔的健康和受伤肺中的全球和区域炎症相比。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号