...
首页> 外文期刊>Respiratory Research >Differential transcriptomics in sarcoidosis lung and lymph node granulomas with comparisons to pathogen-specific granulomas
【24h】

Differential transcriptomics in sarcoidosis lung and lymph node granulomas with comparisons to pathogen-specific granulomas

机译:肺病变肺和淋巴结肉芽肿的差分转录组织与病原体特异性肉芽肿的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Rationale Despite the availability of multi-“omics” strategies, insights into the etiology and pathogenesis of sarcoidosis have been elusive. This is partly due to the lack of reliable preclinical models and a paucity of validated biomarkers. As granulomas are a key feature of sarcoidosis, we speculate that direct genomic interrogation of sarcoid tissues, may lead to identification of dysregulated gene pathways or biomarker signatures. Objective To facilitate the development sarcoidosis genomic biomarkers by gene expression profiling of sarcoidosis granulomas in lung and lymph node tissues (most commonly affected organs) and comparison to infectious granulomas (coccidiodomycosis and tuberculosis). Methods Transcriptomic profiles of immune-related gene from micro-dissected sarcoidosis granulomas within lung and mediastinal lymph node tissues and compared to infectious granulomas from paraffin-embedded blocks. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were profiled, compared among the three granulomatous diseases and analyzed for functional enrichment pathways. Results Despite histologic similarities, DEGs and pathway enrichment markedly differed in sarcoidosis granulomas from lymph nodes and lung. Lymph nodes showed a clear immunological response, whereas a structural regenerative response was observed in lung. Sarcoidosis granuloma gene expression data corroborated previously reported genomic biomarkers ( STAB1, HBEGF, and NOTCH4 ), excluded others and identified new genomic markers present in lung and lymph nodes, ADAMTS1, NPR1 and CXCL2 . Comparisons between sarcoidosis and pathogen granulomas identified pathway divergences and commonalities at gene expression level. Conclusion These findings suggest the importance of tissue and disease-specificity evaluation when exploring sarcoidosis genomic markers. This relevant translational information in sarcoidosis and other two histopathological similar infections provides meaningful specific genomic-derived biomarkers for sarcoidosis diagnosis and prognosis.
机译:摘要尽管有多个“OMICS”策略,但仍然难以捉摸,尽管有多个“OMICS”策略,但对结节病的病因和发病机制已经难以捉摸。这部分是由于缺乏可靠的临床前模型和验证的生物标志物的缺乏。随着肉芽肿是结节病的关键特征,我们推测出肌肉组织的直接基因组询问,可能导致鉴定失调的基因途径或生物标志物签名。目的促进肺部和淋巴结组织(最常见的影响器官)的结节病变肉芽肿的基因表达谱系的发育结节病变,并与传染性肉芽肿(可团状霉菌和结核病)进行比较。方法对肺部和纵隔淋巴结组织中的微侵扰性结节病颗粒组织的免疫相关基因转录组分布,并与来自石蜡包埋块的传染性肉芽肿相比。在三种粒状疾病中比较了差异表达的基因(DEGS),并分析了功能性富集途径。结果尽管组织学相似之处,血液病变粒细胞瘤和肺部血管瘤中的钙和途径显着不同。淋巴结显示出明显的免疫应答,而在肺中观察到结构再生反应。结节病变肉芽肿的基因表达数据证实先前报道的基因组生物标志物(刺激1,HBEGF和NOTCH4),除外,并确定了肺和淋巴结,AdamTS1,NPR1和CXCL2中存在的新基因组标记。结节病和病原体肉芽肿的比较鉴定了基因表达水平的途径分歧和常见。结论这些研究结果表明在探索结节病虫病基因组标志物时组织和疾病特异性评估的重要性。这种相关的翻译信息在结节病和其他两个组织病理学类似的感染中为结节病症诊断和预后提供了有意义的特异性基因组衍生的生物标志物。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号