首页> 外文期刊>Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. >Serum complement levels in immune thrombocytopenia: Characterization and relation to clinical features
【24h】

Serum complement levels in immune thrombocytopenia: Characterization and relation to clinical features

机译:免疫血小板减少症的血清补体水平:表征与临床特征的关系

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Complement may contribute to platelet destruction in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but serum complement levels of ITP patients are not well defined. This study characterized C3, C4, and CH50 levels from 108 ITP patients in comparison with 120 healthy subjects. Methods Results of complement testing performed using commercially available turbidimetric immunoassays were retrospectively analyzed. Mean complement levels in patients with ITP were compared with levels from a sample of 120 healthy subjects, and subgroups of ITP patients were compared. Regression analyses evaluated for relations between low complement levels and disease severity and response to ITP treatments. Results One hundred eight patients with ITP were included. Mean C3, C4, and CH50 were significantly lower in patients with ITP compared with healthy subjects, largely driven by the 32% of patients with ITP with substantial reductions in one or more assays. Patients requiring treatment had lower mean C4 (18.1 vs 23.1?mg/dL; P =?.042) and CH50 (50.4 vs 63.0?mg/dL; P =?.004). Mean C3 was higher in splenectomized versus nonsplenectomized patients (120.6 vs 101.0?mg/dL; P =?.035). In multivariable analyses, reduced complement did not predict treatment response to corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, or thrombopoietin receptor agonists but low C4 levels did predict more severe ITP (relative to nonsevere disease, odds ratio for severe/refractory disease: 6.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.75‐52.54; P =?.090). Complement levels in patients with ITP were generally consistent over repeat measurements. Conclusions Complement levels are reduced in one‐third of patients with ITP and are associated with more severe disease. Additional study is needed to evaluate if hypocomplementemia is predictive of response to emerging complement‐directed therapies.
机译:背景技术补充可能有助于免疫血小板减少症(ITP)的血小板破坏,但ITP患者的血清补体水平并不明确。该研究表征了来自108个ITP患者的C3,C4和CH 50水平,与120个健康受试者相比。方法回顾性分析了使用市售浊度免疫测定进行的补体测试的结果。将ITP患者的平均补体水平与来自120个健康受试者的样品的水平进行比较,并且对ITP患者的亚组进行了比较。回归分析评估低补体水平和疾病严重程度与ITP治疗的反应之间的关系。结果包括一百八名ITP患者。 ITP与健康受试者相比,ITP患者的平均C3,C4和CH50显着降低,主要由32%的ITP患者推动,在一个或多个测定中具有大量减少。需要治疗的患者具有较低的平均c4(18.1 vs23.1≤mg/ dl; p =α.042)和ch 50(50.4 vs 63.0Δmg/ dl; p =α.004)。脾切除的患者的平均c3较高,而不是非折射症患者(120.6 vs 101.0?mg / dl; p = 035)。在多变量分析中,减少的补充没有预测对皮质类固醇,静脉内免疫球蛋白或血小板生成素受体激动剂的治疗反应,但低C4水平确实预测了更严重的ITP(相对于非耐性疾病,严重/难治性疾病的差距比例:6.28; 95%的置信区间,0.75-52.54; p = 090)。 ITP患者的补体水平通常通过重复测量一致。结论ITP患者的三分之一患者的补体水平降低,与更严重的疾病有关。需要进行额外的研究来评估低统一血症是否预测对新出现的补充定向疗法的反应。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号