首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Health >Outcome of multifaceted interventions for improving the quality of antenatal care in Nigerian referral hospitals
【24h】

Outcome of multifaceted interventions for improving the quality of antenatal care in Nigerian referral hospitals

机译:关于提高尼日利亚推荐医院产型产型产型产型介入的多方面干预措施的结果

获取原文
           

摘要

The study was designed as quasi-experimental research to investigate the effectiveness of multifaceted interventions for improving the quality of antenatal care in referral hospitals in Nigeria. Two referral hospitals (the Central Hospital in Benin City, South-South Nigeria, and the General Hospital in Minna) served as intervention sites, while two hospitals in comparable locations, (the Central Hospital Warri and the Suleja Hospital Abuja) were the control hospitals. Intervention activities consisted of the introduction of a strategic plan with the shared vision of reducing maternal mortality by 50% in 1?year in the hospitals; staff training and re-training; the establishment of an automated appointment system; composite health education involving couples and providers; advocacy with policymakers; and the implementation of maternal death reviews and surveillance. These activities were implemented in the intervention hospitals over 21?months (October 2017 to June 2019). Exit interviews of pregnant women at intervention and control sites by trained interviewers were used to assess the quality of antenatal care after their visit, A total of 777 women were interviewed (427 in the intervention sites and 350 in the control sites). Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Poisson and logistic regression to determine the extent to which health providers in the clinics completed the 18 signal functions identified in the WHO assessment tool. The regression analyses showed the interventions were effective in improving six quality indicators (QIs) for counseling and information sharing. The difference between intervention and control sites on these QIs was significant at ?0.05. On the contrary, the interventions were less effective for maternal and fetal measurements; and disease testing and management QIs. The positive effects of the interventions are likely due to the effectiveness of the training and health education components. The lack of intervention impact observed for maternal and fetal measurements may be due to the high workload of care staff and inadequate clinic supplies, which we did not address. We conclude that interventions that address the quality of antenatal care in low-resource settings should focus on improving all elements of care, including adequate staffing and mobilization of material resources. This study was registered in the ISRCTN on August 14th, 2020. Trial Registration Number. SRCTN17985403 . Retrospective registration. The reason for the retrospective registration is the current non-recognition of the Nigeria Clinical Trials Registry (NCTR); which is currently not an ICMJE or WHO ICTRP approved registry. (This study was registered in the Nigeria Clinical Trials Registry on April 14th, 2016. Trial Registration Number NCTR No: 91540209 ).
机译:该研究被设计为准实验研究,探讨了多方面干预措施改善尼日利亚推荐医院产型产前的效果的有效性。两个推荐医院(贝宁市中心医院,南南南南尼日利亚和米纳的普通医院)担任干预料,而两家医院在可比地点(中央医院Warri和Suleja Hospital Abuja)是控制医院。干预活动包括引入战略计划,共同愿景将孕产妇死亡率降低50%在1年内在医院的一年;员工培训和重新培训;建立自动预约系统;综合健康教育涉及夫妇和提供者;与政策制定者的宣传;并实施孕产妇死亡评价和监测。这些活动在21岁以上的干预医院实施了几个月(2017年10月至2019年6月)。通过训练有素的面试官在干预和控制地点出入孕妇采访,用于评估他们访问后的产前护理质量,共有777名妇女接受了采访(427名在介入地点,控制场350人)。通过单变量和多变量泊松和逻辑回归分析了数据,以确定诊所的健康提供者在谁中确定的卫生提供者在谁中确定了18个信号。回归分析表明,干预措施在改善六个质量指标(QIS)方面是有效的辅导和信息共享。这些QIS上的干预和控制位点之间的差异在<?0.05中显着。相反,干预措施对孕产妇和胎儿测量不太有效;和疾病测试和管理QIS。干预措施的积极影响可能是由于培训和健康教育组成部分的有效性。对于孕产妇和胎儿测量的缺乏干预影响可能是由于护理人员的高工作量和临床用品不足,我们没有地解决。我们得出结论,解决低资源环境中产前护理质量的干预措施应专注于改善所有护理要素,包括适当的人员配置和动员材料资源。该研究于2020年8月14日在ISRCTN注册。试验登记号码。 SRCTN17985403。回顾性注册。回顾登记的原因是目前的不承认尼日利亚临床试验登记处(NCTR);目前不是ICMJE或WHO ICTRP批准的注册处。 (本研究于2016年4月14日在尼日利亚临床试验登记处注册。试验登记号码NCTR NO:91540209)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号