首页> 外文期刊>Reading & Writing >The elephant in the room: Tensions between normative research and an ethics of care for digital storytelling in higher education
【24h】

The elephant in the room: Tensions between normative research and an ethics of care for digital storytelling in higher education

机译:房间里的大象:规范研究与高等教育中数字讲故事的关怀伦理关系

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Digital storytelling (DST) has been embraced in classrooms around the world as a way to unpack issues of identity and positionality which are critical for any pedagogy concerned with social justice. However, adopting this process-orientated practice into higher education raises ethical concerns especially in relation to the normative approach to traditional research. Objectives: The objective of this article was to explore the ethical concerns surrounding DST when used as a pedagogy and to determine if an ‘ethics of care’ approach could help to mitigate the ethical dilemmas experienced by teachers and researchers alike. Method: A single case study, narratives, illustrations and reflections from a final-year arts education project were used to explore some of the ethical issues we encountered when employing DST as a pedagogy and in educational research. Results: The results of this reflection show that special attention needs to be paid to the following issues: the collection and interpretation of data, how anonymity and confidentiality are ensured in DST, who owns the stories, how sampling is conducted and how consent is sought and, finally, how the tenant of ‘do no harm’ is adhered to in DST. Conclusion: We argue that traditional deontological approaches to ethics are not able to fully respond to the complex, nuanced and ongoing concerns posed by DST projects. We adopt Joan Tronto’s Ethic of Care to argue that ethical practice cannot be contained in codes of conduct alone and cannot simply be signed off on by institutional review boards, but is rather a matter of a daily personal, professional and political caring practice.
机译:背景:数字讲故事(DST)已在世界各地的教室中被围绕着,以解开身份和定位问题的一种方式,这对任何与社会正义有关的教育学至关重要。然而,采用这种进入过程的实践进入高等教育提高了伦理问题,特别是关于传统研究的规范方法。目的:本文的目标是探讨围绕DST的道德问题,当用作教育学时围绕DST,并确定“护理”方法的伦理方案有助于减轻教师和研究人员所经历的道德困境。方法:单次案例研究,叙事,插图和反思,从最后一年的艺术教育项目被用来探讨我们在雇用DST作为教育学和教育研究时遇到的一些道德问题。结果表明,需要特别注意以下问题:数据收集和解释,如何在DST中确保拥有故事的DST匿名和保密程度,如何进行抽样以及寻求如何同意最后,在DST中遵守“不伤害”的租户。结论:我们认为,传统的道德道德方法无法充分应对DST项目提出的复杂,细微和持续的疑虑。我们采用Joan Tronto的伦理的伦理,争辩说,独自行为守则不能遏制道德做法,不能简单地通过机构审查委员会签署,但是日常个人,专业和政治关怀实践的问题。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号