首页> 外文期刊>Logistics >New Seaport Development-Prospects and Challenges: Perspectives from Apapa and Calabar Seaports, Nigeria
【24h】

New Seaport Development-Prospects and Challenges: Perspectives from Apapa and Calabar Seaports, Nigeria

机译:新的海港发展前景和挑战:尼日利亚Apapa和Calabar海港的观点

获取原文
       

摘要

Arising from the menace of city logistics problems in Lagos State with reference, in particular, to the Apapa and Tin Can Island seaport axis, the federal and state governments, in collaboration with private investors, seek to establish and/or develop some potential seaports to ease the burden of maritime logistics. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to examine the prospects and challenges of the development of these proposed seaports and to analyze the efficiencies of the two selected seaports in order to determine the need for the required investment in seaport development. Descriptive analysis was used to examine the challenges of the selected seaports, while stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) was used to determine the efficiency of the selected seaports. The responses of the stakeholders and shipping companies to the various challenges were collected through a well-structured questionnaire, and the 2008–2017 cargo throughputs of the selected seaports were used as the secondary data for stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). It was discovered that the challenges associated with the Calabar Seaport were the draught level, cost of shipment, accessibility to industries, and condition of other modes of transport. From the stochastic frontier, the Lagos Apapa seaport is quite efficient, with an efficiency value of 0.9764921, while Calabar is slightly above average, with a mean efficiency value of 0.6086686. By implication, the congestion in the seaports in the Lagos seaport complex with the maximum level of efficiency creates the need for another seaport, which must be sited at a well-vetted location. In the case of the Calabar seaport, the efficiency level shows that the seaport is yet to be fully utilized. Hence, investment decisions regarding whether to build a new seaport or use dredging to upgrade the existing ones must be carefully analyzed, as the establishment of the proposed Ibom deep seaport may further affect the efficiency of the Calabar seaport(s). In conclusion, demand should be the driving force for port establishment: when a port cannot generate enough traffic, it may not yield returns on investment as expected.
机译:从拉各斯州的城市物流问题威胁,特别是对APAPA和锡岛海港轴,联邦和州政府与私人投资者合作,寻求建立和/或发展一些潜在的海港缓解海上物流的负担。因此,本文的目标是审查这些提出的海港发展的前景和挑战,并分析两种选定的海港的效率,以确定对海港发展所需投资的需求。描述性分析用于检查所选海港的挑战,而随机前沿分析(SFA)用于确定所选海港的效率。利益攸关方和航运公司通过结构良好的问卷收集了各种挑战的答复,2008年和Ndash; 2017年选定海港的货物吞吐量被用作随机前沿分析(SFA)的二级数据。有人发现,与卡拉巴尔海港相关的挑战是草案水平,装运成本,行业可行性以及其他运输方式的状况。从随机边境,拉各斯APAPA海港非常有效,效率值为0.9764921,而葫芦略高于平均水平,平均效率值为0.6086686。通过暗示,Lagos海港群体海港的拥堵具有最高效率水平的需求,可以在谦虚地点占据另一个海港的需求。在葫芦海港的情况下,效率水平表明海港尚未充分利用。因此,关于建立新的海港或使用疏浚以升级现有的投资决定必须仔细分析,因为建议的IBOM Deep Seaport的建立可能会进一步影响Calabar Seaport的效率。总之,需求应该是港口建立的驱动力:当港口无法产生足够的交通时,可能不会按预期产生投资回报。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号